'Prudent' Tice Says Dow 12,000 is Doomed

Headlines (Scroll down for complete stories):
1. 'Prudent' Tice Says Dow 12,000 is Doomed
2. Fed Meets, Investors Bet on No Action
3. Existing Home Sales, Prices Tumble
4. Retirees Face Shrinking Lump-Sum Payouts

 

1. 'Prudent' Tice Says Dow 12,000 is Doomed

David Tice, manager of the $682 million Prudent Bear Fund, is warning that Dow 12,000 isn't here to stay, reports Forbes.

His outlook isn't surprising. Tice's Prudent Bear Fund is an inverse fund, which profits when stocks drop. The fund returned 63 percent in 2002 in the midst of the bear market, and so far this year it's up 6.85 percent as of October 24.

Story Continues Below

Tice tells Forbes that the economy is showing troubling signs even as the Dow reaches new highs. He cites the U.S. trade deficit as well as the slowing housing market as the most important concerns for the economy.

Of the nation's gigantic current account deficit, Tice says that the country won't be able to maintain its standard of living without relying on foreign borrowing. "I believe that the credit expansion will end in tears," says Tice.

Tice also worries about real estate debt. He sees defaults, foreclosures and a giant recession in the works because of the bursting real estate bubble.

Tice explains that sagging property values, combined with the inability to flip homes quickly is squeezing homeowners. In addition, rising interest rates and adjustable-rate mortgages are a recipe for disaster not just for flippers but also for all homeowners.

Tice's recommendations: Tice tells Forbes readers that now is a great time to short technology stocks and the Nasdaq 100 ETF, the QQQQ. With the Nasdaq rebounding to its highest level since 2001, Tice says the index is overvalued because growth rates aren't going to be impressive. He points to Advanced Micro Devices and Novellus Systems as two technology stocks worth shorting, in particular.

For buying, Tice recommends precious metals and energy plays. These defensive stocks will guard against a dropping dollar, which he says is inevitable given the status of the trade deficit.

Editor's Note:


2. Fed Meets, Investors Bet on No Action

U.S. Federal Reserve policy-makers resumed a two-day meeting Wednesday that was widely expected to conclude with a decision to hold interest rates steady along with a fresh warning on inflation.

The Federal Open Market Committee began the second day of meetings at about 9 a.m., a Fed official said. The U.S. central bank is expected to announce its decision around 2:15 p.m.

While the rate decision holds little drama for financial markets, any hints the Fed might give on its future policy course will be scrutinized closely.

After a more than two-year long campaign of interest rate increases, the Fed moved to the sidelines in August and again held overnight rates steady at 5.25 percent in September.

However, officials have kept the possibility of more rate hikes on the table as they continued to warn of the risk inflation could stay unacceptably high.

One FOMC voter, Richmond Federal Reserve Bank President Jeffrey Lacker, has dissented against the decisions to leave rates unchanged at the past two meetings, saying more needed to be done to bring inflation down.

A month ago, financial markets had been thinking a housing-led slowdown in U.S. economic growth could lead to a series of rate reductions beginning early next year.

Recently, however, markets have begun to price in some chance that the Fed might raise credit costs again to deal with persistent price pressures.

© 2006 Reuters.

Editor's Note:


3. Existing Home Sales, Prices Tumble

Sales of existing homes fell for a sixth straight month in September and the median sales price dropped on an annual basis by the largest amount on record, further documenting a lukewarm housing market.

The National Association of Realtors reported that sales of previously owned homes fell by 1.9 percent in September to a seasonally adjusted sales pace of 6.18 million units, the slowest sales rate since January 2004.

The median price of a single-family home fell to $219,800 last month, a drop of 2.5 percent from the price in September 2005. That was the biggest year-over-year price decline in records going back nearly four decades.

Housing, which had set sales records for both new and existing homes for five consecutive years, has been rapidly loosing altitude this year, as consumers were battered by rising mortgage rates, soaring energy prices and a slowing economy.

However, economists with the Realtors said they believed the housing decline could be hitting bottom.

"The worst is behind us as far as a market correction -- this is likely the trough for sales," said David Lereah, the Realtors' chief economist. "When consumers recognize that home sales are stabilizing, we'll see the buyers who've been on the sidelines get back into the market."

However, analysts said that the weakness in housing could last for several more months with a real upturn in sales not occurring until next spring.

Sales were down in all sections of the country except the South, which posted a small 0.4 percent decline. Sales fell the most in the Northeast, a drop of 3.7 percent, followed by the West, where sales were down 3.1 percent, and the Midwest, where sales fell by 2.8 percent.

The inventory of unsold homes, after climbing to all-time highs, fell for a second straight month, decreasing 2.4 percent, to 3.75 million unsold homes at the end of September, which represents a 7.3 months supply at the September sales pace.

Sales of single-family homes dropped by 1.6 percent to an annual rate of 5.42 million units while sales of condominiums fell by 3.2 percent to an annual rate of 763,000 units.

The 2.5 percent drop in the price of single-family homes pushed them down to $219,800 while condominium prices fell by 3.2 percent to a median price which was also $219,800.

© 2006 Associated Press.

Editor's Note:


4. Retirees Face Shrinking Lump-Sum Payouts

The pension-reform legislation Congress passed in August is resulting in smaller lump-sum payouts for retirees who choose this option, says The Wall Street Journal.

The WSJ explains that the change in the law is a double whammy. "The pension law made two changes that effectively reduce payouts when a retiree takes his pension as a lump sum. Companies calculate this by taking the monthly payment the retiree is entitled to and then figuring how much this is worth as a lump sum in today's dollars, making certain assumptions about life spans and future investment returns.

"Under the new law, companies starting in 2008 will be able to assume a higher investment return, using a corporate-bond interest rate instead of the lower Treasury-bond rate previously used. This change produces a smaller lump sum payment, because the higher rate represents the return an employee would have to earn to generate the same retirement income as if he were receiving the pension as a monthly paycheck."

For Larry Korwatch, who's planning his retirement, the changes mean a $200,000 cut in his lump-sum payment, says the WSJ.

"It's going to mean lump sums are smaller for everybody," says David Certner, director of legislative policy for AARP, the seniors advocacy group. The Journal says that about half of those eligible for lump-sum payments take them.

To top it off, because of a delay in passing the pension reform, the effective date of the changes is January of this year. That means if retirees took a lump-sum payout in the past 10 months, they may have to fork over some of the cash.

"You can't slice and dice a man's nest-egg the year he retires without advance notice," says Joe Clark, an Anderson, Ind., financial adviser with a client whose lump-sum pension was reduced by the change, tells the WSJ.

The WSJ says that the only way to avoid the reduction in payments is for retirees to opt for lifetime payments. However, that leaves retirees at risk if their company goes bankrupt, as we've seen in recent cases such as US Airways and UAL.

Editor's Note:


Editor's Notes:

109-109-109