Privacy Policy
Home | Money | Entertainment | Links | Advertise | Search | Cartoons | Contact | Shop November 21, 2009
Web
NewsMax.com
Powered by
 

From the NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...

Saturday, May 27, 2006 5:10 p.m. EDT

Crawford: Hillary Takes No Prisoners

Sen. Hillary Clinton "takes no prisoners" when confronting her political enemies, a noted political guru says.

Because of that, Clinton's potential rivals for the 2008 Democrat presidential nomination fear to take her on and reveal early their presidential plans.

According to political analyst Craig Crawford, that leaves just three potential rivals of the New York senator who can safely take the gloves off when dealing with her: former vice president Al Gore, failed 2004 presidential candidate John Kerry and his running mate John Edwards.

Writing in the May 29 issue of "CQ Weekly," Crawford predicted that Gore "could join the 2004 Democratic team, John Kerry and John Edwards, in what would be an exclusive club: potential rivals to New York’s junior senator who would have nothing to gain against her by keeping the gloves off."

None of the three, Crawford wrote, would have any interest in the vice presidential spot under Hillary and would have no reason to cuddle up to her in the hope of getting the nod as her running mate.

He went on to explain that "Gore spent eight years in office as next-in-line; it is impossible to imagine Kerry accepting a demotion after running in the top spot; and Edwards has already played second fiddle."

As for other Democratic presidential hopefuls, so far none has dared to attack Hillary, Crawford wrote, noting "They all act like she is not there, as if they should be taken seriously without articulating why the conventional wisdom predicting her nomination is wrong."

Aside from the obvious fact that going negative on Hillary would doubtlessly doom any chances of being her running mate especially since even more so than her husband - former president Bill Clinton - Sen. Clinton is well known for a take-no-prisoners stance against political foes.

So it will be interesting to see if any of the also-rans are prepared to go after Sen. Clinton. The first to do so can join the club of serious presidential contenders.

"Bill Clinton is well known for a take-no-prisoners stance against political foes," Crawford writes . . . "it will be interesting to see if any of the also-rans are prepared to go after her [Sen. Hillary Clinton]." He added, "The first to do so can join the club of serious presidential contenders." Right now, the sole club members are Gore, Kerry and Edwards. Crawford took a look at each one:

  • "Gore is the wild card in that bunch, and while saying he has no current intention of running, he knows better than to close the door completely. The reaction to his recent turn on the national stage from liberal bloggers and elsewhere among party faithful was surprisingly positive. Starring in his 'An Inconvenient Truth,' his highly acclaimed documentary on global warming, and in a bit on NBC’s "Saturday Night Live,” Gore is seemingly emerging from nowhere to captivate the attention of Democrats hungry for a party hero."

  • "Kerry could find that the back-to-the-future sentimentality for Gore does not extend to him. Memories of his inadequacies as the nominee last time remain too fresh, although he is showing signs of an emerging ability to speak directly. On a recent interview with Tim Russert on NBC’s 'Meet The Press,' the Massachusetts senator uncharacteristically managed to answer a few yes-or-no questions by actually saying 'yes' or 'no,' although he went on to give typically long-winded explanations."

  • "Edwards seems better positioned than Kerry to take hold in the 2008 presidential race. His incessant travels around the country are well received. Although regarded among party operatives as a disappointment on the 2004 ticket, he can make a sound case that he was bedeviled by a poorly run Kerry machine that did not know what to do with him and inexplicably wrote off the South despite picking a son of the region as running mate."

    Crawford wondered if any of the three could beat Clinton for the nomination, suggesting that the trouble with them is that the best case they can make is that Hillary cannot win a national general election. That, he writes, "is a tough case coming from three men who have recently lost national general elections."

    He concludes that "somebody must seed doubts before Clinton closes in on her rumored goal of raising $200 million for a presidential campaign. At that point, running for running mate is all the rest of the Democratic field will be able to hope for."

    Editor's note:
    Hillary’s White House Plans Unmasked! See Secret Story – Click Here Now!
    "Hillary’s Secret War" – Coulter says "It’s required reading" – See It Here!

    Inside Cover Stories
    FBI Seeks 2 Mysterious Men on Ferry

    Publisher: Conservatives Do Read As Much As Liberals

    Romney Shrugs Off Mormon History Film

    Bob Grant to Return to Radio

    Carville Seeks Perfect '08 Bumper Sticker More Inside Cover Stories
     

  • Print Page Forward Page E-mail Us RSS Feed
     
    Home | Money | Entertainment | Links | Advertise | Search | Cartoons | Contact | Shop
    All Rights Reserved © 2009 NewsMax.Com

    106-106-103