Privacy Policy
Home | Money | Entertainment | Links | Advertise | Search | Cartoons | Contact | Shop November 08, 2009
Web
NewsMax.com
Powered by
 

From the NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...

Tuesday, Aug. 9, 2005 9:55 a.m. EDT

John Stossel: Cut Off Government PBS Funding

Republicans should stop dithering about reducing subsidies to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, newsman John Stossel says.

His advice: Eliminate government funding of PBS altogether.

Story Continues Below

 

Stossel, co-anchor of ABC News' "20/20," writes in his recent syndicated column that "public broadcasting is a classic example of welfare for the well-off. We PBS viewers are 44 percent more likely than other Americans to make more than $150,000 a year.

"I enjoy PBS, but it hardly seems fair that the government demands you buy it for me."

When PBS was launched in the 1960s, most Americans had only the Big Three networks to choose from, so PBS provided more variety than TV offerings. But now there are hundreds of channels and if there's a demand for what PBS might offer, "the market will provide it," said Stossel.

He points out that PBS receives only 15 percent of its funds from the federal government, and if PBS and National Public Radio lost all their federal money, they wouldn't disappear.

Stossel would like to see the federal dollars taken out of PBS's pocketbook.

In June, a GOP-controlled House subcommittee voted to slash federal funding for public television and radio. But after a furious lobbying campaign by public broadcasting supporters, the Senate Appropriations Committee voted on July 14 to restore the $111 million cut from CPB's budget.

Said Stossel: "When anyone suggests cutting the PBS budget, people say, 'They’re trying to kill "Sesame Street.' But 'Sesame Street' is big business and would survive in any environment."

As for the claim that only PBS can do "honest" news broadcasts and documentaries because it doesn't depend on advertising dollars, Stossel maintained: "Twenty-five years ago, Ralph Nader proclaimed that consumer reporting would never appear on commercial TV. It would only thrive on public TV, he said, because commercial stations would defer to advertisers.

"Today, PBS carries almost no consumer reporting, probably because the bureaucrats who run it are too nervous about offending anyone. By contrast, there is plenty of consumer reporting on commercial TV.

"The free market serves its customers, and in the TV business, the customers are viewers. PBS, on the other hand, is broadcasting by bureaucracy. This is not a good thing."

Editor's note:
Hat Protects Your from Sun and Cancer! Get the Desert Hat Worn By Our Troops – Click Here Now!
"Live Free or Die" – get the T-shirt – Click Here Now!
Ronald Reagan’s Motto: "It CAN Be Done" – get his Oval Office desk plate – Click Here Now

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Media Bias

Inside Cover Stories
FBI Seeks 2 Mysterious Men on Ferry

Publisher: Conservatives Do Read As Much As Liberals

Romney Shrugs Off Mormon History Film

Bob Grant to Return to Radio

Carville Seeks Perfect '08 Bumper Sticker More Inside Cover Stories
 

Print Page Forward Page E-mail Us RSS Feed
 
Home | Money | Entertainment | Links | Advertise | Search | Cartoons | Contact | Shop
All Rights Reserved © 2009 NewsMax.Com

102-104