The New York Times is acknowledging that it made "initial inquiries" into whether there was anything "irregular" in the adoptions of Supreme Court nominee Judge John Roberts' children, ages four and five.
But in a statement published late Thursday night, the paper's public editor denied launching a full-blown investigation.
Story Continues Below
"We did not order up an investigation of the adoptions," Public Editor Joe Plambeck insisted, in response to a firestorm of controversy over the Drudge Report's claim earlier in the day that just such a probe had been launched.
Quoting an unnamed senior editor, Plambeck admitted, however, that the Times did look into the Roberts' children, saying, "We have not pursued the issue after the initial inquiries, which detected nothing irregular about the adoptions."
Plambeck hinted that Times executive editor Bill Keller may have played a role in nixing the probe, explaining that the top Timesman "told us that he
would not stand for any gratuitous reporting about [Roberts'] children."
"[Keller] said that as an adoptive parent he is particularly sensitive about this
issue."
Plambeck's denial first appeared on columnist Michelle Malkin's Web site, and was issued in response to complaints from her readers.
Editor's note:
Become a member of NewsMax’s "Land of the Free, Home of the Brave" Club – get the T-shirt – Click Here Now
Ronald Reagan’s Motto: "It CAN Be Done" – get his Oval Office desk plate – Click Here Now
Rush Limbaugh Says the War for the Court Has Begun! Find Out Details – Click Here Now
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Bush Administration
Media Bias