In contrast, only one station, a lake ice station, evidenced a significant thinning trend. Source: October 2006 issue of Climate Research, Alexandre Gagnon of the University of Liverpool (United Kingdom) and William Gough of the University of Toronto Scarborough (Canada) reported on trends in Hudson Bay sea ice thickness using data from the Canadian Ice Service.

Story Continues Below

Here are some weather facts and a look at how the cold is affecting life in Homer: "41 Days of Freezing" — Anchorage hasn't recorded a temperature above freezing since Feb. 3. "9.2 Degrees Average" — Since Feb. 18, the average temperature in Anchorage has been 9.2 degrees. "1956 Was the Coldest" — Temperatures during this period averaged 7.2 degrees in 1956, the coldest on record.

For example the tropics and the temperate zones are getting warmer. And there is a reason: The oceans are warming thanks to increased heating by the sun, and tectonic activity such as underseas volcanic eruptions and red hot magma seeping up from cracks in the ocean floor.

The heated oceans send more and more moisture aloft along with CO2, creating heavier and heavier rain or snowfall, and increased clouds in the northern regions which retard summertime melting of snow and ice.

As the superheated air moves north, it runs smack into the super cold air coming south, resulting in violent storms. The colder the air coming south and the warmer the hot air coming north, the more violent the storms the collisions create.

If Mr. Gore, who blames the violent weather on global warming is right — that the arctic region is warming — how can it continue to send southward the super cold fronts that are required to create more and more and more violent weather in the temperate zones? That frigid air is an essential component in creating storms. Take it away and the storms - the tornadoes, blizzards and hurricanes — will lose their punch, which is obviously not happening.

Just a little more of the common sense the globaloneyists spurn.

Let me close with excerpts from Britain's enormously insightful Melanie Phillips in her March 13th blog (melaniephillips.com):

"The climate change truth-deniers — On BBC Radio Four's Today programme this morning, the Environment Secretary David Miliband, asked whether there was anything in last week's Channel Four documentary ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle', gave the following memorable reply: 'I didn't see the programme — but I promise you I will do a blog demolishing its contents.'

"This just about sums up the received wisdom on man-made global warming: conclusion first, evidence later. Miliband's reply was of a piece with the general response by the global warmers to the C4 film's evidence: it has either been ignored, or rubbished with some feeble arguments, or its production team has been subjected to character assassination. It is, of course, a response straight out of the Stalinist manual of propaganda and manipulation.

"The evidence that science — as opposed to the politicised version of it — does not support global warming theory has been obvious ever since this theory first burst upon us in the late 1980s. What is only now surfacing, however, is the evidence of the corruption of the processes being used to promote this scam and the intimidation of any scientists who try to tell the truth.

"For me, the most explosive revelations on the C4 film were scientists testifying to this corruption — from the vast amounts of grant money being used to create an entire global warming industry making it financially difficult for scientists not to produce ‘research' that supported the theory; to the falsification of the computer models in order to produce the alarmist predictions that would attract such funds; to the IPCC's deletion of crucial parts of the evidence that didn't fit the theory; to the circular argument that there was now a ‘consensus' on the theory among all the finest minds in science around the world.

"And let's not forget the astounding fact that the IPCC itself has said in terms that the scientific evidence for its fourth report —evidence which has not yet even been finalised — is to be brought into line with the ‘summary' of that evidence which was published last month. In other words, the ‘summary' was published before the evidence of which it was allegedly a reflection had even been finalised — and that evidence is to be changed to fit it if it deviates from what the summary said. Conclusion first, evidence later — or rather, evidence denied."

Amen!

Phil Brennan is a veteran journalist who writes for NewsMax.com. He is editor and publisher of Wednesday on the Web (www.pvbr.com) and was Washington columnist for National Review magazine in the 1960s.

He also served as a staff aide for the House Republican Policy Committee and helped handle the Washington public relations operation for the Alaska Statehood Committee which won statehood for Alaska.

He is also a trustee of the Lincoln Heritage Institute and a member of the Association For Intelligence Officers. He can be reached at pvb@pvbr.com

Editor's note:
Al Gore`s Global Warming Spin Debunked, More Here
You Can Profit from Globalism and Technology Advances - click here now!
Hold the Toothpaste – Fluoride Is Toxic – Click Here Now

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Global Warming