THE LEFT COAST
REPORT
A Political Look at Hollywood
Headlines (Scroll down for complete stories): 1. Barbara Walters Goes Rosie, Praises Hugo Chavez
2. Hollywood Nation Spotlight: Valerie Plame
3. Tables Turned on Michael Moore
4. Mr. Zsa Zsa Sues Bill O'Reilly
5. Hollywood Heavyweight Phil Spector on Trial
1. Barbara Walters Goes Rosie, Praises Hugo Chavez
Communist dictator Hugo Chavez is "passionate," "dignified," and "intelligent,"
according to ABC's Barbara Walters and Robin Roberts.
The empress of "The View," the place where American leaders are routinely called
liars and murderers, apparently thinks that a guy whom every human rights group
has condemned is a real sweetheart.
Although Chavez has threatened to shut off oil to the U.S., called our president
a "devil" and also referred to him as a "political corpse," Walters assured her
audience that the outspoken dictator "does like this country."
Story Continues Below
Ignoring the fact that Chavez has destroyed any semblance of freedom of the
press or property rights in his country, co-hosting Roberts referred to the
despot as the "controversial president of Venezuela" and gushed, "He is a
passionate man that's very apparent."
The audience learned from Walters that Chavez is not crazy but does drink 26
cups of coffee a day.
Chavez boasted, "I would win an election campaign against Bush, if I were an
American, of course, if I were a U.S. citizen."
He's correct, if voters had the IQ of "The View."
2. Hollywood Nation Spotlight: Valerie Plame
Liberal dream girl Valerie Plame was a recent witness in a staged Capitol Hill
production put on by Democratic Bush haters.
The sometimes spy acknowledged things that were already known, like the fact
that she and hubby Joe Wilson are die-hard Dems.
Interestingly, the former ambassador's wife was never asked about the central
issue of the investigation that claimed "Scooter" Libby for a collateral
offense. Plame was not specifically asked whether her status was, in fact,
covert, within the meaning of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.
Plame predictably claimed that her work was covert despite the fact that she was
listed under Wilson's listing in "Who's Who in America." Using the phrase "I'm
not a lawyer," Plame described her work status without reference to the statute.
As Bill Gertz reported, Plame's cover was actually exposed by a Russian spy in
the 1990s. The CIA had sent classified documents to the Swiss embassy in Havana
where Cubans got a hold of Plame's name.
Criminal lawyers in D.C. know that if Plame's job fell within the parameters of
the statute, eager-beaver special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald would have made
a beeline to indict the guy he knew had revealed Plame as Wilson's wife,
then-Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.
The truth is, there is nothing covert about Plame and Wilson. They have sought
publicity and money ever since they became cause celebs of the left.
Keeping themselves overtly in the public eye, they posed for the cover of Vanity
Fair, negotiated book deals and a Hollywood production contract, and became
multimillionaires.
3. Tables Turned on Michael Moore
Filmmakers Debbie Melnyk and Rick Caine set out to film a biography of someone
they truly admired.
However, while producing "Manufacturing Dissent," the two made a discovery that
their hero, Michael Moore, was far from the person, or for that matter the
professional that they had imagined.
During their movie making experience, Melnyk and Caine learned about Moore's
fabricated persona; in particular that he did not grow up in working class
Flint, Mich., but in Davison, a wealthy nearby suburb.
They discovered that Moore was not removed as editor of Mother Jones for
political reasons as he has claimed, but was fired for bad editing. They learned
that Moore shot footage of himself and interspersed it with other events to
imply things that never actually happened (such as Moore asking Roger Smith,
former CEO of General Motors, a question at a shareholders' meeting).
The most devastating information unearthed, though, is that Moore actually did
speak with then-GM chairman Roger Smith, whose supposed evasion is the central
premise of "Roger & Me," but withheld the footage from the film. (Premiere
previously reported this but "Manufacturing Dissent" actually displays footage
of Moore interviewing Smith.)
Other well-known documentary filmmakers such as Errol Morris ("The Fog of War")
express disdain in the film for Moore's documentary style.
By evading interviews with the filmmakers, Moore and his staff behave like the
corporate targets that Moore despises. At one event, the filmmakers' soundboard
is unplugged while other reporters are allowed to tape. At another event, a
staffer kicks the filmmakers out of an arena and throws their camera to the
ground.
An indication that the makers of "Manufacturing Dissent" have had a serious
change of heart about Moore is revealed in the tagline used to market the film.
It reads: "Michael Moore doesn't like documentaries. That's why he doesn't make
them." A slogan that appears on movie posters also conveys their dampened
sentiments: "It's Never Been so Hard to Get Michael Moore in Front of the
Camera."
Because the criticism of Moore comes from self-described "progressive liberals,"
who were originally motivated by their admiration for Moore before they
reluctantly concluded that he was not what he appeared to be, the mainstream
press are actually treating the film differently than similar polemic material
from the Right.
Here is a sampling of some recent mainstream media takes:
"Balanced documentary lifts lid on Michael Moore," Reuters
"Filmmakers question Michael Moore's tactics," AP
"An intelligent, provocative and, arguably, even necessary examination
of the phenomenon of Michael Moore — the man, his movies and his
methods . . ." Variety
Moore's talent has been to bring humor, a brisk pace and controversy to the
documentary genre. "Manufacturing Dissent" demonstrates that Moore also brings
fabrication.
The Left Coast Report thinks maybe now there will be more skepticism about Moore
from left-of-center folks who in the past refused to question his work.
4. Mr. Zsa Zsa Sues Bill O'Reilly
Zsa Zsa Gabor's eighth husband, Prince Frederic Von Anhalt, has filed a lawsuit
against the Fox News Channel and Bill O'Reilly for damage to his reputation. He
is asking for $12 million in damages.
Von Anhalt is one of many who claim to have fathered the late Anna Nicole
Smith's baby, Dannielynn Hope.
Von Anhalt's lawsuit is based on O'Reilly referring to him as a "fraud."
Zsa zsa's hubby claims that since the show with the derogatory reference aired,
people give him dirty looks when he goes shopping.
"They say, 'Look, here comes the fraud,'" Von Anhalt says.
Apparently, adultery holds no comparable stigma.
5. Hollywood Heavyweight Phil Spector on Trial
Expect the courtroom to be standing room only when the press of the world crowd
in to report on the murder trial of legendary record producer Phil Spector.
Spector is accused of killing movie actress Lana Clarkson.
Jury selection begins this week for those who will decide whether on Feb. 3,
2003, the reclusive Spector murdered Clarkson after bringing her from the House
of Blues to his home.
Spector gained fame in the 1960s for his "wall of sound" recordings. He has
written such rock classics as "Da Doo Ron Ron," "Be My Baby" and "You've Lost
that Lovin' Feeling." He also produced the Beatles's "Let It Be" album and
George Harrison's "Concert for Bangladesh."
Clarkson acted in Roger Corman's cult film "Barbarian Queen." She was working as
a hostess at the House of Blues when she was spotted by Spector.
Spector's chauffeur, Adriano De Souza, told a grand jury that Spector had said,
"I think I killed somebody," and that Spector had emerged from his home with
blood on his hands holding a gun.
The court battle will center on the question of who pulled the trigger. The
coroner's office noted that Clarkson had gunshot residue on both of her hands
and may have pulled the trigger.
A slew of forensic scholars is expected to demonstrate expertise in front of the
jury.
Spector has pleaded not guilty and has remained free on $1 million bail since
being arrested after the shooting. If convicted, he faces life in prison.
Evidently, Superior Court Judge Larry Paul Fidler didn't learn much from the O.J.
debacle. He has decided to let the trial be televised.