Headlines (Scroll down for complete stories): 1. Wesley Clark's Remarks Draw Heat from Jews
2. Howard Fineman: Mayor Daley Will Back Obama
3. Iraq War to Cost $1.2 Trillion
4. Poll: Religious Right Won't Determine GOP Nominee in '08
5. Imus Supports McCain for President
6. We Heard: Katie Couric, Paul Krugman, Monica Lewinsky
1. Wesley Clark's Remarks Draw Heat from Jews
The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) has called on retired Gen. Wesley Clark to
apologize for an allegation that "New York money people" are pushing the U.S.
for a war with Iran, charging that it's a slur against Jews.
In a conversation with liberal blogger Arianna Huffington, the former NATO chief
who ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004 was quoted as
saying that bombing Iran before exhausting diplomatic efforts was "outrageous."
When he was asked why he was so sure that the United States was headed in that
direction, Wesley reportedly replied: "You just have to read what's in the
Israeli press. The Jewish community is divided but there is so much pressure
being channeled from the New York money people to the office seekers."
According to the Jewish publication Forward, "the phrase New York money people'
struck unpleasant chords with many pro-Israel activists. They interpreted it as
referring to the Jewish community, which is known for its significant financial
donations to political candidates."
Story Continues Below
In response to Clark's comments, the RJC announced the launch of an ad campaign
in Jewish newspapers nationwide charging that Clark's remarks "reinforce
dangerous and harmful stereotypes of the Jewish community."
RJC Executive Director Matthew Brooks said: "That kind of language, based on old
stereotypes about Jews, feeds into anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about Jewish
power. Clark's remarks were hurtful, damaging, and wrong, and Wesley Clark
should apologize to the American Jewish community for saying them."
Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, told Forward
after he spoke to Clark whose father was Jewish: "He is a friend of Israel and
is not an anti-Semite, but some of the things he said are very, very
unfortunate."
Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley and his family "can't stand the Clintons" and are
backing Illinois Sen. Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination in
2008, Newsweek columnist Howard Fineman reports.
Appearing on Don Imus' radio show on Thursday morning, Fineman who is also the
magazine's senior editor said: "Back in 2004, when [Obama] was one of many
candidates running in the Democratic primary for the Senate in Illinois, the
Daley family backed another candidate.
"Obama understood the decision and the day after the Daleys announced that they
were supporting another candidate, [Mayor Daley's brother] Bill Daley got a very
nice hand-written note from Obama saying he completely understood the decision
and would probably do the same thing if he was in that position, but hoped they
could work together if and when he eventually won the election, which he did . .
.
"Now the Daley family is 100 percent behind Obama . . . They have a lot of
connections and a lot of skill and that will give him a lot of grounding in
traditional politics that he would not have otherwise had.
"And by the way, the Daleys can't stand the Clintons . . . Obama will run his
campaign out of Chicago, which is very smart, and that will help."
Daley's support for Obama brings back memories of another strong Chicago mayor
playing a major role in a presidential election: In 1960, Daley's father Richard
J. Daley and his Chicago Democratic machine were instrumental in John F.
Kennedy's narrow 8,000-vote victory in Illinois.
A Daley's backing of a Democratic hopeful worked for JFK and could work again
for Obama.
Before the U.S. invasion of Iraq five years ago, the Pentagon estimated the war
would cost about $50 billion. New estimates place the figure at a mind-boggling
$1.2 trillion.
The war operation itself the equipment, fuel, combat pay for soldiers,
salaries of reservists and contractors and reconstruction expenses costs more
than $300 million a day, with an eventual total of $700 billion over the course
of the war, according to an estimate by economist Scott Wallsten reported by The
New York Times.
Add to that the cost of replacing hardware used in Iraq, some $100 billion. Then
there's the $250 billion cost of providing disability payments and medical care
for veterans.
Other economists also include a "gas tax" imposed on American families the
increase in the price of fuel resulting from the conflict which they estimate
at $150 billion.
To put the $1.2 trillion total in perspective, the Times notes that implementing
all of the 9/11 Commission recommendations would cost less than $50 billion,
providing universal preschool would cost $35 billion, and the National Cancer
Institute's annual budget is about $6 billion.
When the Pentagon originally estimated the cost of the war at $50 billion, White
House economic adviser Lawrence Lindsey predicted it would in fact cost as much
as $200 billion. According to the Times, "President Bush fired him in part for
saying so."
4. Poll: Religious Right Won't Determine GOP Nominee in '08
Moderation could be the order of the day in the 2008 presidential election,
according to a poll of Democratic and Republican insiders.
The Atlantic magazine queried 70 insiders with ties to the GOP and asked the
question: "Can someone who is opposed by the religious right win the Republican
presidential nomination in 2008?"
A slight majority, 53 percent, said "Yes."
"Given the serious issues confronting our nation and world, and the emerging
splits in the primary electorate, ideological purity will become secondary to
leadership attributes," one respondent opined.
Said another: "Yes. If the Democratic nominee is Senator Clinton, the religious
right will vote for any decent Republican."
Among the 41 percent who said "No" (6 percent said "Depends/Don't Know"), one
wrote: "The religious right is the least stable part of the GOP coalition, and
the coalition is not so big that any element can be jettisoned."
The Atlantic also queried 68 Democratic insiders and asked: "Can someone who is
not clearly identified as an antiwar candidate win the Democratic presidential
nomination in 2008?"
A larger majority, 71 percent, said "Yes."
"Someone who favored the war, as did a majority of Americans, can bring us back
together in the wake of this tragic mistake," one responded.
Another wrote: "Yes. Hillary can and probably will win."
Among the 26 percent who said "No," one stated: "Every serious Democratic
candidate will position themselves as strongly antiwar, including Senator
Clinton. Some candidates will have more credibility as an antiwar candidate than
others, but they will all be antiwar."
Presidential hopeful John McCain has won support from a surprising source
radio host Don Imus, a former supporter of John Kerry.
Speaking with New York Times columnist Frank Rich on Thursday morning, Imus
said: "I'm with McCain right now . . . I'm down with McCain and I'm not going to
change. I don't care who else runs. I like other people, but I'm voting for
McCain."
Imus backed Kerry during the 2004 campaign, and Kerry has often appeared on Imus'
show. As recently as last November, Imus referred to Kerry as "my friend."
McCain has also received the support of a conservative Christian talk-show host
in Iowa, site of the nation's first Republican caucus.
The endorsement came from Maxine Sieleman, founder of the Iowa chapter of
Concerned Women for America, who has hosted a show on a Christian radio station
in Des Moines since 1982, The New York Sun reported.
In a statement, Sieleman praised McCain for his "consistent record supporting
pro-life, pro-family legislation," and his commitment to appointing "strict
constructionist judges."
THAT Larry King is a fan of Katie Couric and thinks her disappointing ratings as
anchor of "CBS Evening News" have more to do with gender than journalism.
"It might still be hard for a woman to anchor the evening news," the CNN host
said.
"That's sad."
Couric will take over the host's chair on "Larry King Live" in April to
interview King as part of a series of special shows honoring his 50th year in
broadcasting.
THAT Forbes magazine publisher Rich Karlgaard is chiding New York Times
columnist Paul Krugman for "pundit malpractice."
His remarks came in a column analyzing the divergence of views on the economic
outlook from left-leaning journalists (negative) and investors (positive).
"Will the journalists or the investors be proved right about the state of the
world?" Karlgaard writes. "I wouldn't bet too heavily on the journalists.
"My favorite example of pundit malpractice is the poor forecasting record of
Paul Krugman, the Princeton economist.
"You'd have no idea the American booms of 1992-2000 and 2002-2006 had occurred
if you confined yourself to Krugman's columns, or worse, some of his books."
Krugman's titles include "The Return of Depression Economics," published in
1999, and "Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of
Diminished Expectations" (1994).
THAT Monica Lewinsky of Bill Clinton impeachment notoriety won't be returning to
the U.S. anytime soon she is currently looking for work in London.
Lewinsky, 33, graduated with a Master of Science degree in social psychology
from the London School of Economics in December.