New Hampshire's House of Representatives has overwhelmingly approved a remarkable bill, HB 1582, that would prohibit the state from participating in the national ID card system that will be created in 2008. A state Senate vote is expected as early as next week.
The federal law in question is the Real ID Act that was glued on to a
military spending and tsunami relief bill last year. Because few
politicians are courageous enough to be seen as opposing tsunami aid,
the measure sailed through the U.S. Senate by a 100-0 vote and
navigated its way through the House 368 votes to 58.
Unless states issue new, electronically readable ID cards that adhere
to federal standards, the law says, Americans will need a passport to
do everyday things like travel on an airplane, open a bank account,
sign up for Social Security or enter a federal building.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is currently devising
regulations for these federalized ID cards. One possibility is that
the "electronically readable" requirement will be satisfied by
embedding a radio frequency identification chip. . .
Story Continues Below
The National Governors Association, hardly a bunch of libertarians,
has called the Real ID Act "unworkable and counterproductive." The
National Conference of State Legislatures wrote to Homeland Security
Secretary Michael Chertoff in October, asking him to defer to states'
expertise. . .
While New Hampshire may be the first, it's not alone. There are no
rules governing what data that private companies (hotels, retailers,
employers) will be able to extract from the Real ID when it's swiped
or placed next to an RFID reader. Will information like a home address
and Social Security number be disclosed? Will a federal database be
alerted whenever the card is swiped or read? And can an RFID'ed
license be read from 20 or 30 feet away?