|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
How Many Americans Are Aware of the "Present Danger"? Lev Navrozov This is my last column in 2006, and it seems proper to try to gauge how many Americans are aware of the "present danger": the development in China of post-nuclear super weapons. I have received from my readers over 1,000 e-mails, and more than 99 percent of them express their horror and their hope that I would continue to "cry in the wilderness." On the other hand, authors of about half a dozen e-mails have ransacked dictionaries in search of insults in the apparent hope that their insults would break my heart and thus ensure my silence. However, on Dec. 8, I received an e-mail that does not belong to either group. It is from David C. Peters II, attorney at law, and a medical scientist, who explains, as he might to a jury, that I lack evidence of what I contend. This does not make him hostile. The last sentence of his e-mail is: "Cheers, I enjoy your articles even when we can agree to disagree." In my column, I described how to the Australian designer of the "Metal Storm," by no means the ultimate weapon, the dictatorship of China offered $100 million a year if he had transferred his residence and work to China. Story Continues Below
Mr. Peters says that he has seen the Metal Storm on TV "and it is hardly the ultimate weapon you describe." I wanted to show how unsparing the dictatorship of China is in trying to collect in China the world's genius and talent in the development of super weapons, including even such by no means the ultimate weapon as the Metal Storm. Now, Peters writes that the Metal Storm "is hardly the ultimate weapon you describe." Had I described it as the ultimate weapon, either I would be an idiot who understands nothing in today's warfare or those who displayed or tried to buy it as "the ultimate weapon" are idiots: the ultimate weapon is not shown publicly until the D-day when it is used and the enemy surrenders unconditionally as did Japan in 1945. Had the United States planned to achieve world domination in the 1940s, it would have had to produce a sufficient number of atom bombs, and — no, not display them, but use them as it did in Japan. If Hitler had been competent geostrategically, he would have realized his coveted world domination in the same way. The dictatorship of China has been planning its world domination in this geostrategically competent way. But Peters, attorney at law, demands evidence. The Australian scientist refused to take the Chinese $100 million. Aha! So there is no irrefutable evidence! "Also, where is the evidence that China is the enemy or that building a conventional weapons [Metal Storm] is over the top, or even threatening to our interests?" Well, an attacker who announces beforehand that his country is an "enemy" is a geostrategic idiot. Prior to attacking Stalin's Russia, Hitler had not announced that he, Hitler, was Stalin's enemy. On the contrary, remember their pact? Hence the success of Hitler's surprise attack up to December 1941. Peters provides an example of how an American attorney at law may fail to understand that today's geostrategy is not a court of justice. There is evidence in the Western legal sense that the dictatorship of China is peaceful. Why, it has not grabbed even Taiwan as part of China. On the other hand, Peters notes that the United States has, in the past decades, launched dozens of wars, such as the war in Iraq. True, but what has this war in Iraq demonstrated — not legally, but geostrategically? That the United States is the safest country (for China) because the United States has been unable for about four years to cope with 7 million Sunnis, while the population of China exceeds that of the USA by about 1 billion people, expected to be armed with the latest post-nuclear super weapons. Inversely — not legally, but geostrategically, China is the most dangerous country for the United States because China is a dictatorship, which many Americans, such as attorney at law Peters, failed to understand, but which constitutes a single giant machine developing post-nuclear super weapons, mortally dangerous for the West. For millennia, China regarded itself as the center of the world, and Europe as the world's backward savage outskirts, where neither silks, nor porcelains were known. Columbus sailed to "India" in search of gold and slaves. China had paper money, nor had it any need for slaves. Today the center of the world is the West. In 1989, a replica of the Statue of Liberty was displayed in Tiananmen Square, and in 1991, a pro-Western movement overthrew the Soviet dictatorship, in the image of which the People's Republic of China was created by Mao in 1949. Yes, in the 19th century, the constitutional West became the center of the world. Unless the People's Republic of China annihilates it or makes it surrender unconditionally, Tiananmen movements will continue until the dictatorship in China collapses as the Soviet dictatorship did in Russia in 1991. There is only one way for the dictatorship of China to regain its erstwhile pre-eminence that lasted for millennia, or at least to preserve its current power and wealth — and the only way is to annihilate the West, the present center of the world, or at least to make it surrender unconditionally. In the 19th century, the British Empire proved by having won two wars in China that China was nil compared with the Western military power, which had emerged from the Industrial Revolution. Now it is for the dictatorship of China to prove that the West is nil compared with the Chinese military power which emerges from the New Secret Military-Industrial Revolution, developing post-nuclear super weapons.
You can e-mail me at navlev@cloud9.net. Editor's note:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Print Page 
Forward Page 
|
| All Rights Reserved © 2008 NewsMax.Com |