Headlines (scroll down for complete stories): 1. Hillary vs. Dean, The Real Story
2. New Report Refutes Global Warming
3. In God We Trust' under Attack
4. GOP Lost Latino Voters
5. Norquist Names Tax Pledge Delinquents
6. We Heard: Hillary Donation, Bush Jinx
1. Hillary vs. Dean, The Real Story
It's now generally accepted that open warfare has broken out between Sen.
Hillary Clinton and Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean over
control of the party.
But readers of NewsMax's Insider Report were the first to learn about the battle
almost two years ago soon after Dean lost his bid for the Democratic
nomination in 2004.
As our loyal readers know, this is a much larger battle than Dean vs. Hillary.
But the battle lines for control of the Democratic Party and possible the
White House in '08 are becoming much clearer after the recent midterm
elections.
Some insiders note that the Clinton camp has orchestrated media reports
crediting Clintonista Rahm Emmanuel, chairman of the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee, for the Democrats' success, at the expense of Dean.
Story Continues Below
Former Bill Clinton strategist James Carville went so far as to say Dean should
be fired from his chairman job for not sufficiently funding competitive House
races, calling his leadership "Rumsfeldian in its incompetence" as in Donald
Rumsfeld.
But way back in June 2005, the Insider Report first disclosed that Clinton was
squared off against not only Dean, but also John Kerry, Ted Kennedy and Al Gore
the so-called "Gang of Four" as potential candidates jockeyed to stop
Hillary in her quest for the White House.
The Clintons "control the Democratic money machine and they absolutely despise
Dean," we reported.
A few weeks later, the Insider Report divulged: "Each member of the Gang has his
own motives. Kennedy is disgusted by the Clintons' moderate politics and he has
already endorsed Kerry for 2008. Kerry has his own presidential ambitions. Gore
blames his 2000 loss on Hillary, who he says siphoned off key resources to her
Senate race. And Dean blames the Clintons for his 2004 campaign woes."
That same issue of the Insider Report told that Edward Klein, author of the book
"The Truth About Hillary," had disclosed how Hillary undermined John Kerry,
publicly promising to go all out to support his 2004 campaign, but then doing as
little as possible.
An October edition of the Insider Report took the story a step further, noting
that Kennedy was signaling Democratic activists and donors: Hillary is not the
only candidate, so don't throw your support to her yet.
And this past July, the Insider noted that other media outlets were beginning to
catch up and had begun reporting that Dean and Clinton were locked in a battle
for supremacy within their party.
"Dean supporters are unhappy with Clinton's stand on Iraq and her cautious shift
to the center, while at the same time they fear she is too polarizing to win a
general election," we reported at the time.
"Clinton supporters question Dean's competence in managing the DNC and believe
his left-wing positions will turn off middle- and working-class voters."
The stakes are high: Dean still controls the Democratic Party apparatus and
Hillary wants to wrest control in anticipation of a White House run.
The battle continues.
But once again, NewsMax's Insider Report was ahead of the media crowd and has
shown that it will cover what no one else wants to talk about.
A recent report from Britain's Sir Nicholas Stern warned of the devastating
economic effects global warming could have on the world in coming years.
But a British researcher has added his voice to those saying the "hysteria" over
manmade global warming distorts the truth.
Stern former chief economist at the World Bank cautioned that if greenhouse
gas emissions weren't significantly reduced, by 2050 the global economy would
shrink by up to 20 percent, millions of people would be permanently displaced
and droughts would plague the earth.
Now journalist Christopher Monckton, who was a policy adviser to Margaret
Thatcher, has published a detailed report attacking the manmade global warming
theory from various angles including the so-called "medieval warm period."
The United Nations, which has issued a widely quoted report on global warming,
"abolished the medieval warm period the global warming at the end of the First
Millennium A.D.," according to Monckton.
A U.N. report in 1996 "showed a 1,000-year graph demonstrating that temperature
in the Middle Ages was warmer than today," Monckton writes in Britain's Sunday
Telegraph.
"But the 2001 report contained a new graph showing no medieval warm period. It
wrongly concluded that the 20th century was the warmest for 1,000 years
"Scores of scientific papers show that the medieval warm period was real, global
and up to [5 degrees Fahrenheit] warmer than now.
"Then, there were no glaciers in the tropical Andes; today they're there. There
were Viking farms in Greenland; now they're under permafrost. There was little
ice at the North Pole a Chinese naval squadron sailed right around the Arctic
in 1421 and found none."
Monckton also writes that Antarctica has cooled and gained ice-mass in the past
30 years, and the oceans have cooled sharply in the past two years.
He calculates that global temperatures will rise only .18 to 2.5 degrees in the
coming century, "well within the medieval temperature range."
And he suggests that rather than point to greenhouse gases as the culprit behind
any measurable global warming, we might blame the sun. He cites a scientist who
maintains that in the past half-century the sun has been warmer, for longer,
than at any time in at least the past 11,400 years.
Monckton's conclusion: "Politicians, scientists and bureaucrats contrived a
threat of Biblical floods, droughts, plagues, and extinctions worthier of St.
John the Divine than of science."
Liberty Counsel has filed a legal brief in an effort to preserve "In God We
Trust" as America's national motto.
Atheist Michael Newdow has filed suit claiming that the motto violates the
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. He lost at the District Court level
and the case is now on appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit in San Francisco.
In 1865, Congress passed an act placing "In God We Trust" on all coins. The
motto has been used on paper money since 1957.
The motto's constitutionality was challenged in another case in 1970, but the
Court of Appeals determined that the phrase "has nothing whatsoever to do with
the establishment of religion."
Atheist Madalyn Murray O'Hair also unsuccessfully challenged the motto in 1979.
Although the District Court ruled against Newdow on the merits, Liberty Counsel's brief argues that the court erred when it found Newdow had standing to bring the suit in the first place.
As a release from Liberty Counsel indicates, to have "standing" a person must have sufficient connection to and harm caused by whatever the person is challenging.
In the brief, Liberty Counsel argues that the District Court "stretched
precedents beyond the breaking point to find that Newdow had standing to
challenge the national motto because the word 'God' offended him. In doing so,
the court usurped its very limited role as adjudicator of legal rights to become
a creator of legal rights."
Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, said: "Permitting a
citizen to sue merely because the person is offended by religious words goes far
beyond the intent of the First Amendment. Passive words cannot establish a
religion. If Michael Newdow is permitted to proceed with his claim, then the
court would become a 'bully pulpit' for any malcontent.
"America was founded upon religious principles and the belief in God. How can
the mere expression of our American heritage establish a religion? Such a
thought is preposterous."
Liberty Counsel, which is affiliated with Liberty University School of Law in
Lynchburg, Va., is a nonprofit litigation, education and policy organization
dedicated to advancing religious freedom and the traditional family.
Latino voters who supported Republican candidates in record numbers two years
ago abandoned the GOP in droves in the recent midterm elections.
In 2004, Republicans received from 40 percent to 44 percent of Latinos' votes as
President George Bush and his brother, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, "appealed to their
socially conservative views on abortion and same-sex marriage," according to the
Washington Post.
In the midterm elections, however, Latinos' support for the GOP fell to just 30
percent "as strident House immigration legislation inspired by Republicans and
tough-talking campaign ads by conservative candidates roiled the community," the
Post reports.
Last year House Republicans, led by Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James
Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin, proposed a bill that would make it a felony to
assist any illegal immigrant.
At the same time, Senate Democrats largely backed legislation that would allow
illegal immigrants to remain in the country if, among other things, they were
willing to pay a fine and learn English.
The Senate bill gained more support among Latinos, who are the nation's largest
ethnic minority at more than 14 million.
Republicans have now begun taking steps to win back the Latino vote. The
Republican National Committee sent out a mass e-mail in which some 20
conservative groups praised the appointment of Sen. Mel Martinez of Florida, a
Cuban American, to lead the RNC.
"Martinez would give the party tremendous legitimacy among the growing Hispanic
voter base," Rep. Tom Feeney, R-Fla., told the Post.
"He's an absolute rock star in the Hispanic community."
Following the midterm elections, 15 Republican members of Congress have not yet
signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge to oppose all tax hikes.
The pledge was formulated by Americans for Tax Reform and its president, Grover
Norquist, and seeks to have politicians put in writing what they often promise
verbally: no new taxes.
A mass e-mail from Norquist reveals the GOP Senators and Congressman who have
not signed the Pledge.
Senate: Richard Lugar (Ind.)
Charles Grassley (Iowa)
Olympia Snowe (Maine)
Susan Collins (Maine)
Thad Cochran (Miss.)
Pete Domenici (N.Mex.)
George Voinovich (Ohio)
House: Christopher Shays (Conn.)
Michael Castle (Del.)
Steve Buyer (Ind.)
Harold Rogers (Ken.)
Vernon Ehlers (Mich.)
Ralph Regula (Ohio)
Todd Russell Platts (Pa.)
Frank Wolf (Va.)
THAT Hillary Clinton is a friend of New York Republican Rep. Pete King, but she
still gave his Democratic opponent $1,000 late in the campaign.
The money came from Clinton's political action committee, Hill Pac, the New York
Daily News reported.
King, who won re-election, wasn't upset by the contribution to his opponent
David Mejias. "There are certain party obligations she had."
Besides, King admitted, he gave a $150 donation to Hillary's challenger for her
Senate seat, John Spencer.
THAT a black magic practitioner performed a voodoo ritual to jinx President
George Bush during his visit to Indonesia.
Ki Gendeng Pamungkas slit the throat of a goat, stabbed a black crow in the
chest and mixed their blood with spice and broccoli before drinking the
concoction and smearing some on his face, according to the business Web site
Resource Investor.
The ritual was intended to send spirits to possess members of the Secret Service
guarding the president and put them in a trance, "leading them into falsely
thinking the president was under attack," the Web site reported, "thus
eventually causing chaos in Bogor Presidential Palace, where the American leader
was scheduled to meet President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono."