Headlines (Scroll down for complete stories): 1. Giuliani's Actions Speaking Loud
2. Hillary Moves Left on Gay Marriage
3. Inhofe Blisters Global Warming Alarmists
4. Rush Limbaugh Proves: I Never Maligned Obama
5. San Francisco Mayor's Young Girlfriend
1. Giuliani's Actions Speaking Loud
Rudy Giuliani won't say if he's running for president in 2008, but his actions
tell a different story.
The former New York mayor recently hired fund-raiser Margaret Hoover, who used
to work in the White House for Bush political guru Karl Rove.
Hoover, the great-granddaughter of former President Herbert Hoover, was paid
$10,000 last month as the new deputy finance director for Solutions America,
Giuliani's political action committee. She reports directly to another former
Bush campaign aide, Anne Dickinson, Giuliani's top fund-raiser.
According to recent polls, the front-runners for the 2008 Republican
presidential nomination are Giuliani, Condoleezza Rice, and John McCain.
Head-to-head polls indicate that Giuliani would beat Democratic front-runner
Hillary Clinton in the general election.
Story Continues Below
While Giuliani insists that he won't make a decision on a presidential run until
next year, he has been traveling around the country making speeches, forging
alliances with Republican stalwarts in key primary states, and raising money for
GOP candidates.
Just last month he donated $105,000 to GOP office seekers and causes, including
$15,000 to candidates in Iowa and $5,000 to the New Hampshire Republican State
Committee.
And in the final week of the 2006 elections, he will be on the campaign trail
stumping for Republican candidates in South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Michigan,
Florida, and New Jersey before ending up in Iowa, where he'll hold rallies for
First District Congressional candidate Mike Whalen and Jim Nussle, the GOP's
nominee for governor.
So far Giuliani has managed to avoid talking about divisive social issues like
abortion and gay rights, which could put him at odds with most Republicans.
What's more, his national reputation remains untarnished by criticism in New
York that ground zero rescue workers were made sick by inhaling toxic dust, or
about Bernard Kerik, his disgraced former police commissioner and business
partner.
When it comes to same-sex marriage, Sen. Hillary Clinton has had a change of
heart.
The New York senator told a recent gathering of gay and lesbian activists in
Manhattan that she won't oppose efforts to enact a same-sex marriage law in the
state if Eliot Sptizer, the odds-on favorite to become the next governor, wants
it enacted into law.
Hillary confessed to the group that she's come a long way since she first ran
for the Senate in 2000, when she opposed gay marriage and civil unions.
She said that she changed her mind after "many long conversations with friends
and others," and that her position "has certainly evolved" since she supported
the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act.
"I believe in full equality of benefits, nothing left out," she told the group.
"From my perspective there is a greater likelihood of us getting to that point
in civil unions or domestic partnerships and that is my very considered
assessment."
Her position, she said, is consistent. "If you go the next step and say, I want
what is called marriage, you're going to have a problem." But if that's what
Spitzer and the legislature want, Hillary won't stand in their way. "I support
states making the decision," she declared.
Clinton defended her position on the Defense of Marriage Act as well as her
decision not to speak during the marriage amendment debate this past June.
She said that without the act which bars federal recognition of gay marriage and
allows states to refuse to recognize such unions from other states, many more
members of Congress would have voted for the constitutional amendment, and it
just might have passed.
Regarding her decision not to speak out against it when it came up for a vote on
the Senate floor, Sen. Clinton explained that it was a matter of strategy. "I
didn't want to dignify it."
Editor's Note:
Bill O'Reilly's New Book Just $4.99 —
Get It Here.
3. Inhofe Blisters Global Warming Alarmists
Newsweek Magazine has finally admitted that it got it wrong on climate change 31
years ago.
In an Oct. 23 article that appeared on the news weekly's Web site, senior editor
Jerry Adler wrote that an April 1975 piece on global cooling had been
"spectacularly wrong."
In that article, the magazine told readers that the Earth was heading into a new
Ice Age.
It reported that there were "ominous signs that the Earth's weather patterns
have begun to change dramatically." And it warned of a "drastic decline in food
production" that would cause shortages affecting "just about every nation on
Earth."
Scientists, Newsweek said, were calling on governments to take immediate action
to head off the coming catastrophe. The magazine even offered a possible
solution — pour soot over the Arctic ice cap to help it melt.
Newsweek's 31-year-old mistake was brought to light by Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla.,
during a 50 minute speech on the floor of the Senate on Sept. 25.
Inhofe, chairman of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee, took
Newsweek and the rest of the mainstream media to task for its hysterical
reporting on climate change, pointing out that they have been scaring the public
with dire predictions of climate related catastrophes for decades.
"Since 1895, the media has alternated between global cooling and warming
scares," Inhofe told his colleagues, adding that "from 1895 until the 1930s the
media peddled a coming Ice Age. From the late 1920s until the 1960's they warned
of global warming. From the 1950s until the 1970s they warned us again of a
coming Ice Age."
And he pointed out that over the years the media has repeatedly issued dire
warnings about global overpopulation, resource scarcity, mass-starvation, and
the death of the world's oceans.
"None of these predictions came true, yet they never they never stopped the
doomsayers from continuing to predict a dire environmental future," the Oklahoma
Republican said.
As for present-day claims of impending doom from global warming, Inhofe says
they are yet another in a long series of scary predictions based on faulty
science promoted by "left-wing environmental groups with a vested financial
interest in hyping alarmism."
University of Oklahoma geophysicist David Deming agrees. "The media hysteria on
global warming has been generated by journalists who don't understand the
provisional and uncertain nature of scientific knowledge," he says.
Weathermen, the professor says, can't predict what the temperature will be in 30
days, so how can they forecast what it will be in 50 years?
"They can't, because Earth's climate system is complex and poorly understood."
Meanwhile, Sen. Inhofe is calling on responsible journalists to break "the
cycles of media hysteria."
He points out that it won't be easy. "Hysteria sells — it's very profitable,"
says the senator.
Rush Limbaugh was right — it was Teddy Kennedy who first referred to Illinois
Sen. Barack Obama as "Osama Obama."
During his Oct. 23 broadcast, an indignant Limbaugh told listeners, "The
Financial Times misquotes me in a story, claiming I am the one who called Barack
Obama, ‘Obama Osama.'"
To prove his point, Limbaugh played a sound byte from Sen. Kennedy's Jan. 11,
2005 luncheon speech at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.
A questioner asked the senator from Massachusetts, "Senator Barack Obama of
Illinois was elected with over 80 percent of the vote, and over a million of
those voters were also President Bush voters. What did Senator Obama do that
Senator Kerry and other Democrats not do?"
Kennedy replied, "There you go. Why don't we just ask Osama bin Laden — Osama
Obama — Obamamam what is — since he won by such a big amount."
"So there you have it," Rush said. "There is the origin of it. It's even worse
than I remembered it being. Osama bin Laden, Osama Obama, Obamamam.
The man at the top of NewsMax magazine's 25 Most Influential Radio Hosts list
had previously explained that he couldn't resist the opportunity to mock Sen.
Kennedy, telling his listeners, "Folks, we had to do a parody tune out of this."
[Editor's note: See the full list — Go Here Now].
Meanwhile, Democrats and the mainstream media have been blasting Limbaugh for
linking Sen. Obama, a possible 2008 Democrat presidential nominee, with the
terror mastermind.
But don't blame Rush. He was only making fun of Teddy.
Gavin Newsom, the San Francisco mayor who famously supports gay marriage, also
has an eye for the young ladies; emphasis on young.
Brittanie Mountz turned 20 last month, which means that she was still a teenager
when the hunky 39-year-old mayor began chaperoning her around town.
Meanwhile city hall reporters want to know if Newsom, who is divorced from Court
TV's Kimberly Guilfoyle Newsom, has been plying the blonde ingenue with
alcoholic beverages.
Photos of underage Brittanie holding a wine glass at a recent department store
gala where Newsom appeared, too, were recently posted on a San Francisco society
photographer's Web site, but the photos were deleted as soon as reporters began
asking questions about them.
The questions enraged the mayor, who called the reporters "mean spirited."
Mayoral spokesman Peter Ragone was quick to distance his boss from the flap,
saying Newsom has never provided Mountz, a model by day and a restaurant hostess
by night, with any alcohol.
If she did have a drink in his presence, Ragone said, it would be news to the
mayor, adding that "Brittanie is a friend of the mayor's. They did not attend
the Bloomingdale's event together. Obviously there has been some uncertainty
about her age. However, given what The [San Francisco] Chronicle has dug up on
her, if she was in fact drinking, that is a mistake. If she was drinking, the
mayor didn't notice."
But anything goes in the City by the Bay, and most residents don't seem bothered
by Newsom's new romance. "I haven't heard anyone say anything negative about the
young woman he's seeing," says Chronicle gossip columnist Leah Garchik. "It's a
live-and-let-live city, and we have a young handsome mayor. More power to them."
Even the mayor's political enemies think his May-October romance is nothing more
than good-time gossip.
Consultant Jack Davis, who is trying to drum up an opponent to run against
Newsom next year, seems nonplussed about the relationship.
"Of all the cities in the world, San Francisco would be the last place that
would raise an eyebrow," he told the San Francisco Chronicle. "It might be an
issue on a national stage, but certainly not locally."
There are only two things that seem to bother the people of San Francisco about
their mayor's romance: Should they marry, the young bride's new name would be
Brittanie Mountz Newsom, and she's a registered Republican.
"How dare he?" wonders one city official. "He knows how to pick 'em. You can
count the young female Republicans in this town on one hand."