Privacy Policy
Home | Money | Entertainment | Links | Advertise | Search | Cartoons | Contact | Shop November 22, 2009
Web
NewsMax.com
Powered by
 
Congressional Intelligence Leaks
Geoff Metcalf
Monday, March 14, 2005
Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. – P.J. O'Rourke

The inability of certain Congress critters to keep their pie holes shut on security matters creates inevitable consequences. One obvious consequence of leaked secret stuff is that the constitutional responsibility of advice, consent and oversight is undermined big time.

Story Continues Below

  Hey, if senators can't be trusted to keep top-secret stuff SECRET, guess what ... there will be natural (and although inappropriate, understandable) reluctance for spooks to fully inform Congress. That's a bad thing.

"Loose lips sink ships" was (and is) a military admonition of caution.

A few years ago leaks of classified information prompted the president to limit top-secret briefings to just eight House and Senate leaders. Some may argue that's eight too many ... or 92 too few.

There ARE consequences to what we do and don't do, and nowhere more so than in the arena of intelligence.

If one offends the sensibilities of political correctness, the immediate draconian consequences are axiomatic: Crucify the bastard! However, if ‘certain people' outrageously break the law, policy and procedures with intelligence matters, accountability drifts on the wind of partisan proclivities.

In December 2004 intelligence types were allegedly seeking a criminal investigation into the outing of a top-secret spy-satellite program by some disagreeable Democrat senators.

The Bush administration was major league torqued over leaks about a new covert generation of satellites.

The premature, inappropriate congressional brain flatulence was articulated by Senators Jay Rockefeller and Ron Wyden. Although the petty partisan hacks didn't ID the satellite program or give details, a Washington Post follow-up identified the program for what it is. The details included in the Post make clear that people with intimate knowledge of the program leaked details.

"At a minimum, what they did was irresponsible," said an official.

It was way more.

Once upon a time discussions were under way about whether to ask Senate Republicans to consider removing Rockefeller and Wyden from the committee. That was December. I haven't been able to find ‘Jack' since.

Despite the vacuous incompetence of the Senate Ethics Committee (as worthless as mammary glands on a bull), in the interest of maintaining the fiction of credibility, the ‘form' of an investigation should have been imperative.

Meanwhile, a criminal grand jury allegedly is still looking into whether former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger should be charged for removal of documents from the National Archives. This is (or should be) a big deal:

  • Berger admitted that he removed as many as 50 top-secret documents from the archives, calling it an "honest mistake." Not even!

  • He also acknowledged that he destroyed some documents, but claimed it was by accident. Accident, my Airborne fourth point of contact!

  • The pilfered documents were classified "Code Word," the highest security classification, above Top Secret. Hellooo!?!?!

    Meanwhile, Sandy says he made "an honest mistake." BULLFEATHERS! It was neither "honest" NOR a "mistake." That he got caught ... THAT was the mistake.

    The unaccountability and lack of consequences for egregious (criminal?) ineptitude is, sadly, routine in the 87 square miles surrounded by reality.

    Senator Pat Leahy was annoyed with the Reagan administration's war on terrorism in the 1980s. At the time he was vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

  • "Leaky Leahy," allegedly threatened to sabotage classified strategies he didn't like.

  • Leahy ‘inadvertently' disclosed a top-secret communications intercept during a 1985 television interview.

  • "The intercept … made possible the capture of the Arab terrorists who had hijacked the cruise ship Achille Lauro and murdered American citizens. …"

  • "The reports cost the life of at least one Egyptian operative involved in the operation."

  • In July 1987, it was reported that Leahy leaked secret information about a 1986 covert operation planned by the Reagan administration to topple Libya's Moammar Gaddhafi.

  • U.S. intelligence officials said Leahy, along with the Republican panel chairman, sent a written threat to expose the operation directly to then-CIA Director William Casey.

  • Weeks later, news of the secret plan turned up in the Washington Post, causing it to be aborted.

  • A year later, as the Senate was preparing to hold hearings on the Iran-Contra scandal, Leahy had to resign his Intelligence Committee post after he was caught leaking secret information to a reporter.

    He should have been indicted, tried and sentenced.

    Leahy's Iran-Contra leak was considered to be one of the most serious breaches of secrecy in the Intelligence Committee's 10-year history. But that was before Senator Richard Shelby leaked that we were tapping Osama bin Laden's satellite phone. Bin Laden immediately stopped using it, denying us the opportunity to find and kill the s.o.b.

    Cicero said: "A nation can survive its fools, even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within … for the traitor appears not a traitor. … He rots the soul of a nation … he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist."

    Editor's note:

  • Ronald Reagan's Motto: "It CAN Be Done" – get his Oval Office desk plate – Click Here Now
  • Tommy Franks' best-selling book "American Soldier" – FREE OFFER – Click Here Now
  • The Deck of Reagan – funny, informative, and FREE offer! Check It Out Here
  • Home | Money | Entertainment | Links | Advertise | Search | Cartoons | Contact | Shop
    All Rights Reserved © 2009 NewsMax.Com

    104