Mexico Declares 'War' on Arizona
Christopher G. Adamo
Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2005
By far the most dramatic menace to this nation's future and safety emanates
from the cauldrons of Islamist extremism. But Americans are also in danger
of losing their country on another front. A far larger incursion into the
American homeland is being carried out via its southern border. Though an
ongoing problem for many years, its instigators now apparently believe they
are ready to take their attack to the next level.
During a January 28 radio interview, Mexican Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto
Derbez threatened the state of Arizona with legal action through the
international courts in order to overturn Proposition 200, a ballot
initiative lawfully passed last fall to curb state expenditures on illegal
aliens.
Story Continues Below
Derbez plans to initially use the "legal capacities" of the United States to
achieve his goal. But if that doesn't work, he will resort to the
intervention of "international tribunals."
Momentarily sidestepping the absurdity of granting any legal capacity to an
international organization regarding strictly internal issues, consider the
larger picture of what is actually being attempted as a foreign power now
makes threats against an individual American state.
The Constitution, in its original form, was never designed to put the
federal government in charge of regulating minute details in the lives of
Americans. Basically, it had two purposes: to act as an arbiter
between the individual states, and to collectively represent those states in
the face of foreign challenges, whether diplomatic or military.
Yet the federal leviathan, which grew monstrously beyond its original
boundaries, has become an overwhelming burden of bureaucratic entanglements
to the citizenry. Meanwhile the Mexican government, a foreign entity, seeks
to intimidate and ultimately dictate the policies of an individual American
state.
Thus far, it has done so with little or no official backlash from the United
States. So, just as those in government are increasingly ignoring the
constitutional limitations to their authority, so are legitimate
constitutional responsibilities to protect the people from foreign incursion
being abandoned, and American citizens are being left defenseless.
Prior to the recent Iraqi elections, it became apparent that foreign
insurgents were causing much of the disorder and mayhem plaguing that
country. Thus the major thrust of American and Iraqi military action focused
on securing that nation's borders.
Yet when a similar incursion threatens to undermine the security and
sovereignty of the United States, this country's government sees fit to
respond with indifference and platitudes.
Of course, Derbez is not acting alone. Mexican President Vicente Fox has
long rejected the term "illegal alien," claiming instead that the invaders
are "undocumented workers" and thus displaying a complete disregard for
American law.
Fox has been unrestrained in his contempt for the very concept of American
sovereignty, promoting the concept of "dual citizenship" whereby Mexican
immigrants would conceivably be eligible to vote in both countries.
Increasingly, his long-term goal appears to be an effort to transform the
American Southwest into a Mexican "Sudetenland," which was the
heavily Germanic region of Czechoslovakia that Hitler exploited as an excuse
to invade and occupy that country.
Though nobody is suggesting a full-scale invasion by Fox's armies, he
increasingly seeks to dictate and define laws and regulations on this side
of the border, so as to maximize his ability to siphon and bleed as much as
possible back into his own nation's economy.
A proper response to such audacity would be to warn Fox that America is just
as likely to bend under his diplomatic pressure as it would from the
terrorist acts of al-Qaida. Unfortunately, President Bush has already given
far too much ground, even embracing the term "undocumented worker" and
advocating amnesty for those who have flouted U.S. law to enter the country.
Such a stance completely ignores the degradation to American society that
results from the mass influx of illegals. Among Arizona's Hispanic
population, 40 percent supported Proposition 200. Clearly, these citizens
realize that they have every bit the vested interest in the future of
America as does the rest of its population, and they comprehend the threat posed to it by the unrestricted invasion of illegals.
It is altogether an abomination of constitutional principles that Arizona
should be left on its own, fighting to maintain control of its destiny. If
Arizona can be isolated and pressured in such a manner, what other state
anywhere in the nation can consider itself safe?
Christopher G. Adamo is a freelance writer who lives in southeastern Wyoming
with his wife and sons. His weekly columns have appeared on AIM.org,
GOPUSA.com and CNSnews.com. He has been involved in grassroots politics for
many years, and has served on the Wyoming Republican Party Central
Committee. His archives can be found at chrisadamo.com.
Editor's note:
Become a member of NewsMax's "Land of the Free, Home of the Brave" Club – get the T-shirt – Click Here Now
Get the Picture That Made America Proud on 9/11 – Click Here
A Retirement Crisis is Coming; Protect Yourself From the Baby Boomers – Click Here