Driver's Licenses Spark Privacy Debate
NewsMax.com Wires
Sunday, Jan. 16, 2005
That plastic card, the one with the lousy photo that's jammed
into your wallet or purse, isn't just a license to drive. It's the
green light to buy a drink, the ticket to federal benefits, the
must-have document to get aboard airplanes. Now it's also the flash
point for an argument about how best to balance America's security
needs with worries that personal privacy could be swept away.
The federal intelligence overhaul that became law last month -
while creating a new national intelligence director and beefing up
border patrols - also aims to close loopholes for identity fraud
that some of the Sept. 11 terrorists used to get aboard the jets
they hijacked.
Story Continues Below
Privacy advocates warn that the new federal standards for
driver's licenses will effectively create a national ID card,
centralizing information that can be misused - by letting the
government track the whereabouts of innocent people, for instance.
Government officials say they're just making the cards more secure,
and that the worries are overblown.
"There is a strong sense of protection of privacy by all of the
administrators of DMV records, because we know the value of the
information we've been entrusted with," said George Tatum, North
Carolina's Department of Motor Vehicle commissioner. "We just want
you to be who you say you are."
The small provision in the massive intelligence overhaul doesn't
take effect immediately. It requires a year-and-a-half of
deliberation by state and federal officials, and others.
States can opt out - refuse to make changes to their driver's
licenses that will be required under the federal law - but then the
licenses would be useless for any federal purpose, from getting
benefits to boarding an airplane guarded by federal screeners.
The intelligence law aims to standardize the documents drivers
present to get a license, the ways DMV workers verify that those
documents are authentic, the information included on a license and
the steps authorities take to ensure licenses can't be forged. The
law also requires that licenses can be read by machines.
In years past, the market for fake driver's licenses was driven
by teenagers hoping to get into a nightclub or repeat drunk
drivers, who lost their licenses trying to get back on the road.
Now, identity theft is a bigger problem, and terrorists a bigger
fear.
Many of the law's specifics have yet to be decided. Will
licenses include biometric information like fingerprints or retinal
scans? Will "machine-readable" mean bar codes or radio frequency
identification systems - in which a tiny computer chip transmits
data and can theoretically be used to track location?
Opposing the Proposals
Some state groups, including the National Conference of State
Legislatures, opposed the proposals to have the federal government
take control of what has traditionally been solely under states'
control - though states have already been moving ahead to tighten
the licensing process.
Advocates in Congress were given a big boost by recommendations
from the Sept. 11 commission, which noted the ease with which
terrorists got licenses. Still, language the House approved that
would have barred driver's licenses for illegal immigrants was
struck from the measure that became law. At least nine states now
allow such licenses.
Civil libertarians warn that the push to make the driver's
license the "gold standard" for ID will only make it easier to
steal someone's identity - and will increase the value of
counterfeit licenses, undermining the hopes that these steps will
provide better security.
"Let's say someone steals your driver's license and substitutes
their biometrics on there, and basically puts their identity on
that card. They then have an official document that says they are
you," said Marv Johnson at the American Civil Liberties Union.
"How do you prove you are you?"
He worries, also, that personal information can be stolen or
sold, or people tracked. The biggest danger is that, as the nation
becomes more security-minded, and relies more on driver's licenses
as ID, our society changes, Johnson said. "You just wind up being
a nation where you have to show your papers to go anyplace. That's
something the American people have never put up with."
The same ID across the country, even with a different logo for
each of the 50 states, is "a national ID card. They might pretend
it's not, but it is," said Bruce Schneier, a computer security
expert and author of "Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about
Security in an Uncertain World."
Government officials say that the information for America's 190
million drivers is protected. Individual states maintain their own
databases on driver's licenses, though all but two states allow
motor vehicle administrations to share information about problem
drivers through a national registry. Better technology should allow
law enforcement to access more and faster data about drivers across
state lines, too, said Betty Serian, deputy secretary for safety
administration at Pennsylvania's Transportation Department.
Still, that doesn't mean private information will be sold,
stolen or made public, Serian said and it doesn't create a central
database - though Schneier would argue that point. "The
information you give us right now is confidential and private,"
she said. "It's not in any way compromised by this new
legislation."
© 2005 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Editor's note:
Free Offer – get up to $60 in books FREE with NewsMax Magazine – Click Here Now
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Privacy