Paul Craig Roberts
Wednesday, Jan. 12, 2005

Story Continues Below

  As for concerns about going it alone, "President Bush does not need to amass rinky-dink nations as 'coalition partners' to convince the Washington establishment that we're right."

The Washington establishment must be wondering today how it was convinced into making such a fatal mistake. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein had no terrorist links or involvement in the Sept. 11 terror attack. U.S. casualties (dead and wounded) now stand at 10 percent of the U.S. invasion force. A few thousand lightly armed insurgents have tied down eight U.S. divisions. Iraq's infrastructure lies in ruins. Fallujah, once a city of 300,000, has been destroyed. The United States has lost control of the roads, and most of the U.S. fighting force is confined to protecting supply lines and its own bases. The U.S. military is cracking under the strain of prolonged service in the field.

The cost of the war mounts, putting more pressure on a collapsing U.S. dollar. The U.S. occupation has recruited thousands of new terrorists for Osama bin Laden and provided a training ground. Torture and torture memos have destroyed America's moral reputation. Civil war looms, as neither Sunnis, Shiites nor Kurds are willing to support a government they do not control. Anti-American feelings throughout the Middle East threaten to undermine the secular puppets that the United States keeps afloat in Pakistan, Egypt and Jordan. There is no light at the end of the tunnel. Generals speak of staying another three, five, seven and 10 years in order "to get the job done."

If this is a cakewalk, what is a failed invasion and a lost war?

Where Adelman, the neoconservatives, the Pentagon, the White House, the flag-wavers and the media went wrong was in thinking the outcome would be settled by a set-piece battle between massed Iraqi and U.S. forces. They thought this because they knew nothing whatsoever about Iraq.

The Sunni-controlled Iraqi military chose insurgency as the strategy. Suck the invader in, and make him unsafe on every street and in every building. Blow him up in his own fortified bases.

Their strategy has worked. Ours has failed.

The question is: Are Americans smart enough to realize this? Our government is not smart enough. The occupant of the Oval Office is drowning in hubris and delusion. The neoconservatives are still in charge of the Bush administration, and they are still talking fantasies about taking out Iran and Syria, and imposing our will on the Middle East. This is extraordinary delusion when we have conclusively demonstrated that we cannot even impose our will on Fallujah, not even after leveling the city to the ground. We cannot even impose our will on the road from Baghdad to the airport.

The promised Iraqi election, if held, will settle nothing. If it is not a total disaster, it might provide cover for U.S. withdrawal, not piecemeal but all at once. If 150,000 U.S. troops are in jeopardy, piecemeal withdrawal will place the remaining troops in more jeopardy.

Americans must ask themselves where lies our biggest problem: Is it the Iraqi insurgency, or is it President Bush who will not admit a mistake?

How long will we bleed in Iraq? How many war crimes will we commit in frustration with an invisible enemy? How intense will Muslim hatred of Americans become? At what point will this hatred unseat our puppets and deliver the Middle East to Osama bin Laden or his equivalent? Three more years? Five more years? We certainly cannot get away with it for seven or 10 more years.

The U.S. invasion of Iraq was a strategic blunder. It has greatly damaged U.S. credibility, while greatly enhancing Osama bin Laden's credibility.

Who will provide the desperately needed leadership that will rescue America from this self-inflicted catastrophe?

COPYRIGHT 2005 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Editor's note: