CIA Nominee Goss Faces Tough Confirmation
NewsMax.com Wires
Wednesday, Aug. 11, 2004
More: Partisan Pelosi caught in flip-flop on Goss
WASHINGTON President Bush's nomination of Rep. Porter
Goss as the next CIA director could lead to tense confirmation
hearings, with plenty of questions about the president's national
security record and goals, just weeks before the Nov. 2 election.
Story Continues Below
Even as some Democrats praised the nomination of Goss, R-Fla.,
who gave up his role Tuesday as chairman of the House Intelligence
Committee, others criticized him as inappropriately partisan for a
job that requires relaying objective advice to policy makers.
"You must keep the politics out of intelligence," said House
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California. "I'm not sure that
has been done here."
"The selection of a politician, any politician from either
party, is a mistake," said Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia,
the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. "Having
independent, objective intelligence going to the president and the
Congress is fundamental to America's national security."
The chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Pat Roberts,
said he was mystified by complaints that Goss was partisan.
"You can disagree with somebody as to the issues from time to
time; I don't think that makes them partisan," said Roberts,
R-Kan. "I don't consider him to be partisan. I've known him for 16
years; that's not a word I would use to describe Porter."
Appearing Wednesday on NBC's "Today" show, Roberts said, "I
think we're all politicians in Congress," and said service in the
national legislature shouldn't be a disqualifying factor.
"We're going to have hearings the first week of September.
We're going to try to expedite this. I think he will be
confirmed," he said. "The Democrats have questions. We'll keep it
civil."
Appearing on the same program, Sen. Dick Durbin, an Illinois
Democrat who is a member of the Intelligence Committee, said: "I
believe the White House may be playing this with a political angle.
If they are, it's unfortunate. We still have a responsibility,
despite the elections, to ask the hard questions."
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., told ABC's "Good Morning America"
that Goss "has shown not only the ability but the willingness to
point out the failures that existed in our intelligence agencies
prior to 9/11."
Meantime, Goss revealed Wednesday that while his nomination is
pending, he was stepping down as chairman of the House intelligence
panel to avoid any conflicts.
"I do believe it is appropriate to remain a member of the
committee," Goss told colleagues Wednesday morning at the outset
of a hearing on the report of the Sept. 11 commission.
In making the announcement Tuesday, Bush ignored advisers who
had favored allowing acting director John E. McLaughlin to remain
on the job until after the November elections.
Bush praised Goss, a former CIA officer, as someone who "knows
the CIA inside and out" and said he was "the right man to lead
this important agency at this critical moment in our nation's
history."
Goss is one of the wealthiest members of Congress, with assets
worth between $6 million and $24 million last year. His biggest
holdings included $1 million to $5 million worth of shares each in
IBM, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and General Electric Co.
Goss, 65, worked as a CIA officer overseeing spies in Central
America and Western Europe during the 1960s until a mysterious
infection forced his retirement. He rose in local and then national
politics after his recovery.
He has never disclosed details of his CIA employment except to
reveal that he worked in Haiti, the Dominican Republic and Mexico,
all tumultuous countries during that decade of the Cold War.
Bush's nomination of Goss could deflect criticism from
Democrat candidate John Kerry that the administration wasn't
moving quickly enough to make important changes affecting America's
intelligence agencies. Among the proposals being worked out is
creation of a national intelligence director, a job Goss could
ultimately inherit.
The complexities of such reforms were underscored Tuesday when
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld suggested there were legitimate
reasons against sharing too much information across U.S.
intelligence agencies. Rumsfeld opposes the creation of a
national intelligence chief, partly because the Pentagon
controls more than 80 percent of the nation's intelligence budget.
During a visit to Oman, Rumsfeld said that if classified
intelligence were shared in too many places, it would run a greater risk
of being leaked, either to foreign governments or to the American
public.
The CIA nomination could put Goss in line to become the United
States' first national intelligence director, if Congress follows
the Sept. 11 commission's recommendations to create that position.
The proposed director would oversee all 15 of the nation's
intelligence agencies and serve as the president's chief
intelligence adviser, a role now played by the CIA director.
"He could be this new person, if we go there," said Sen. Mike
DeWine, R-Ohio, a member of the Intelligence Committee. "He'll be
someone who can walk in to the president and look him in the eye
and tell him what the truth is and not flinch."
White House press secretary Scott McClellan would not rule out
Goss being picked for national intelligence director or say whether
Goss was a leading candidate. If Bush is not re-elected, Goss'
position could be short-lived, subject to the decision of the next
president.
© 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
2004 Elections
9/11 Commission
Bush Administration
DNC
George W. Bush
Homeland/Civil Defense
RNC
Sen. John McCain
War on Terrorism