Kerry Backs Much of Pre-emption Doctrine

Kerry Backs Much of Pre-emption Doctrine

NewsMax.com Wires
Friday, July 16, 2004

More: Is Kerry lifting from the president's playbook?

Bush in March 2003: "when it comes to our security, we really don't need anybody's permission."

And: "The United States of America has the sovereign authority to use force in assuring its own national security."

And: "our freedom of action to defend our country."

And: "confronting the threat posed by Iraq is necessary by whatever means that requires."

And: "We will work with the U.N. ... but the purposes of the United States should not be doubted."

And: "If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long."

And: "Our coalition must act deliberately, but inaction is not an option."

And: "But some governments will be timid in the face of terror. And make no mistake: If they do not act, America will."

WASHINGTON – Democrat presidential candidate John Kerry said Friday he would be willing to launch a pre-emptive strike against terrorists if he had adequate intelligence of a threat.

Kerry offered some support for one of the most controversial aspects of President Bush's national security policy, even as he criticized the president for not reforming intelligence agencies after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Story Continues Below

"Am I prepared as president to go get them before they get us if we locate them and have the sufficient intelligence? You bet I am," he said at a news conference at his Washington headquarters.

The Bush administration laid out the doctrine of pre-emption months before the Iraq war began in March 2003. It argued that the United States could not rely on its vast arsenal to deter attacks and must be willing to strike first against potential threats. Critics of the policy say the Iraq war shows how the country could be driven to war by flawed intelligence.

Kerry said the intelligence needed to be improved so that the word of a U.S. president "is good enough for people across the world again."

Bush-Like Jab at U.N., France, Germany ...

But he added, "I will never allow any other country to veto what we need to do, and I will never allow any other institution to veto what we need to do to protect our nation."

Kerry spoke one week after the Senate Intelligence Committee sharply criticized prewar intelligence on whether Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. The report did not address Bush's role, but Kerry said, "as commander in chief, the president of the United States must take responsibility for what happens on his or her watch."

The four-term U.S. senator said that nearly three years after the Sept. 11 attacks, "this president has not taken action sufficient to fix the intelligence problems that have plagued us."

Outlining his own proposals, Kerry repeated his call for creating a director of central intelligence who would oversee all facets of the nation's intelligence operations. He also proposed at least doubling spending for clandestine operations, improving interagency coordination and accelerating reforms at the FBI to improve its handling of domestic intelligence.

But Kerry stopped short of supporting a proposal by his running mate, Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, to create a domestic intelligence agency similar to the British MI5 agency. Supporters of a new agency say the FBI has been more concerned historically about criminal investigations than intelligence; opponents fear a domestic spy agency threatening Americans' privacy.

Editor's note:

The REAL Story on John Kerry: A Special Investigation – Click Here

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics: