Democrats Grapple With Dukakis' Legacy
NewsMax.com Wires
Monday, July 12, 2004
BOSTON Michael Dukakis is not expecting a starring role
at the Democratic National Convention, even though it is being held
in his home state.
Fairly or unfairly, the former presidential nominee represents
every political label that Democrats want their current candidate
to avoid: liberal, soft-on-crime, tax-and-spend, and loser to a man
named Bush.
Story Continues Below
To embrace him would surely dredge up unflattering memories of
the oft-caricatured politician's amazing plummet in the 1988
campaign, and invite trouble for this year's nominee from
Massachusetts: Sen. John Kerry, who served as Dukakis' lieutenant
governor for two years.
"The first rule for the Democrats is to avoid a picture of John
Kerry and Mike Dukakis together at all costs," said Rob Gray, a
former spokesman for Republican Massachusetts Gov. William Weld.
"Dukakis' race was an embarrassment for the party. He blew a
17-point lead. And the party feels in retrospect that they
nominated the wrong guy."
But Massachusetts Democrats say that ignoring Dukakis would be
an injustice to a man who has served the party loyally for decades.
Never again a political candidate, Dukakis has been a regular on
the airwaves defending the party and its candidates.
"He may have run a bad campaign, but he is not a bad person,"
said Dan Payne, a Democrat consultant who worked on Kerry's
Senate campaigns. "He has never embarrassed himself, his state or
his party. It would be a disservice to him to ignore him
completely."
Although convention officials have not released their full slate
of speakers for the July 26-29 convention, Dukakis is not expected
to be high on the list.
Dukakis, who keeps a low profile as a professor of political science at Northeastern University, said he had been told to
keep a night open midweek for what he assumes would be a brief
appearance with others to wave at the crowd.
"My own strong view on this is that those of us who have run
before unsuccessfully ought to be around, ought to wave, ought to
be introduced. But this ought to be John Kerry's convention," he
said. "It is very important that this be Kerry's convention, as
the one in Atlanta was mine. I screwed it up afterward, but the
convention was great."
Every four years, both parties have to contend with the question
of what to do with their own particular cast of presidential
losers. Former President Jimmy Carter was shunned for two decades
after his crushing 1980 defeat to Republican Ronald Reagan, before
being honored with a video tribute in 2000. The 1972 loser, George
McGovern, has been a guest at previous conventions but not given
any kind of a prominent role.
Two of the three Republicans who lost over the past 30 years are
former presidents, George H.W. Bush and Gerald Ford, and have
been accordingly allotted prominent, if not starring roles at
subsequent conventions. In 2000, Republican Bob Dole, who was on
losing tickets in 1996 for president and 1976 for vice president, gave a speech.
The dilemma is a bit more complex for Democrats this year,
however, because of the convention's location in the state where
Dukakis presided as governor for 12 years.
"We're going to do everything we can to honor Michael Dukakis
during that week. Just because he lost an election doesn't mean he
wasn't right," said state Democratic Chairman Phil Johnston, who
once worked in the Dukakis administration.
State leaders are planning a reception for Dukakis on July 28.
And Dukakis is scheduled to moderate a forum with students on the
value of public service.
© 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Editor's note:
The REAL Story on John Kerry: A Special Investigation – Click Here
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
2004 Elections
DNC
Presidential Conventions
Sen John Kerry