Annan Opposes 'War Crimes' Exemption for U.S.
NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, June 17, 2004
Read more about the many dangers of the U.N.'s globalist court.
UNITED NATIONS Defying the United States,
Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged the U.N. Security Council on
Thursday to stop shielding American peacekeepers from international
prosecution for war crimes.
Annan cited the U.S. prisoner abuse scandal in Iraq in opposing
a U.S. resolution calling for the blanket exemption for a third
straight year.
The United States introduced the resolution last month but has
delayed calling for a vote. Despite intensive lobbying, Washington
doesn't have the minimum nine "yes" votes on the 15-member
council to approve a new exemption, council diplomats said.
The current exemption expires June 30.
The Bush administration argues that the International Criminal
Court, which started operating last year, could be used for
frivolous or politically motivated prosecutions of American troops.
The 94 countries that have ratified the 1998 Rome Treaty
establishing the court maintain it contains enough safeguards to
prevent frivolous prosecutions.
This year, human rights groups argue that another U.S. exemption
is unjustified in the wake of the Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal. And
council nations that support the court say nobody should be exempt.
Annan supported both arguments.
"For the past two years, I have spoken quite strongly against
the exemption, and I think it would be unfortunate for one to press
for such an exemption, given the prisoner abuse in Iraq," he told
reporters Thursday.
"It would be even more unwise on the part of the Security
Council to grant it. It would discredit the council and the United
Nations that stands for rule of law and the primacy of rule of
law," Annan said. "Blanket exemption is wrong. It is of dubious
judicial value, and I don't think it should be encouraged by the
council."
Besides seeking another year's exemption from arrest or
prosecution of U.S. peacekeepers, Washington has signed bilateral
agreements with 89 countries that bar any prosecution of American
officials by the court and is seeking more such treaties.
The International Criminal Court can prosecute cases of
genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed after it
was established on July 1, 2002, but will step in only when
countries are unwilling or unable to dispense justice themselves.
It is the culmination of a campaign for a permanent war crimes
tribunal that began with the Nuremberg trials after World War II.
The court has no jurisdiction over the events in Iraq, first
because neither the United States nor Iraq have ratified the Rome
Treaty, and second because of the U.N. exemption.
When the court was established, the United States threatened to
end its involvement in far-flung peacekeeping operations
established or authorized by the United Nations if it didn't get an
exemption for American peacekeepers.
Three of a Kind: France, Germany, Syria
After contentious negotiations, the council initially approved a
one-year exemption. In 2003, the resolution to exempt U.S.
peacekeepers was renewed for another year by a vote of 12-0 with
three abstentions: France, Germany and Syria.
This year, France, Germany, Spain and Brazil have said they will
abstain on a new extension. China, Romania, Chile and Benin are
also reported to be on the list of probable abstentions, council
diplomats said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
British Foreign Office minister Bill Rammell said his country
strongly supported the court but was prepared to consider extending
the U.S. exemption because of "the impact on peacekeeping
operations."
© 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Editor's note:
The U.N.’s Dangerous Agenda – read NewsMax’s special report – Click Here
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Bush Administration
Clinton Scandals
Saddam Hussein/Iraq
United Nations