'Brain Fingerprinting' and Thought Crimes
NewsMax.com Wires
Friday, April 30, 2004
More: Scientists Map 'Guilty Knowledge' in Brain
DENVER A company behind a new technology promoting
"brain fingerprinting" to fight crime and terrorism is
considering Colorado for a training center that would employ up to
300 people.
Brain fingerprinting uses a headband with sensors to measure
brain waves, which promoters say can help authorities determine the
truth by detecting information stored in the brain.
An example is that a murder investigation could be aided if
showing a picture of a murder scene to a suspect reveals brain wave
measurements that indicate familiarity with the scene. The brain
waves are fed through an amplifier into a computer that uses
software to display and interpret them.
The hope is the results will become widely accepted as
scientific and legal evidence, such as DNA tests.
Results from a test in 2000 on a man convicted in a 1977 Iowa
murder showed his brain didn't hold specific knowledge of the crime
but did contain details about the night of the murder that were
consistent with his alibi.
The Iowa Supreme Court overturned the man's conviction last
year, citing new evidence that prosecutors withheld police reports
pointing to another suspect and that the state's key witness had
recanted his testimony.
Brain Fingerprinting's Web site says the technology can also be
used to detect Alzheimer's disease and the efficacy of drugs and
other treatments and help in the fight against terrorism by
identifying suspects.
Supporters of brain fingerprinting include the DaVinci
Institute, a Louisville-based futurist think tank. The institute
announced Wednesday the creation of a task force to work on making
Colorado a national center for the technology.
Critics of the technology say it might fail if people forget
details of a crime over time.
"If your memory isn't functioning [because] you're stoned when
you commit the crime, you're certainly not going to remember it the
next day, let alone years later," said J. Peter Rosenfeld, a
psychology professor at the Institute for Neuroscience at
Northwestern University in Chicago.
He said his tests of the process showed the results of brain
fingerprinting were questionable.
© 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Editor's note:
Shop NewsMax.com’s store for the best deals on books, tapes, videos and more! Click Here Now!
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Health Issues
Privacy
War on Terrorism