Broadcasters Consider Code of Conduct
NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, Apr. 01, 2004
WASHINGTON Broadcasters meeting Wednesday to discuss
indecency said they would consider an industry code of conduct, an
idea the nation's chief telecommunications regulator suggested they
should pursue.
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michael Powell said
if the industry left it to the government to set strict standards
for broadcast decency, they would not like the result.
"You do not want to ask the government to write a `Red Book' of
dos and don'ts," Powell told the gathering organized by
National Association of Broadcasters.
"I understand the complaint
about knowing where the line is, but heavier government
entanglement through a `dirty conduct code' will not only chill
speech, it may deep-freeze it. It might be an ice age that would
last a very long time."
NAB President Eddie O. Fritts Jr. said a code was mentioned by
most speakers at the daylong seminar, and would be seriously
considered. He said the discussion would continue at NAB's
annual meeting later this month.
The closed-door session attracted 350 broadcasters, many of them
owners of just a few television or radio stations. The four major
networks - CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox - are not members of the
association, though executives of ABC and Fox did speak at lunch.
Viacom Inc., which owns CBS as well as the Infinity Broadcasting
radio chain, employs controversial radio host Howard Stern. The FCC
recently proposed fining Infinity $27,500 for a Stern show, and
Clear Channel Communications, the nation's largest radio chain,
suspended him from its six stations that carry the program.
"A lot of broadcasters had never approached the line," Fritts
said. "The issue was what about whose who have and what have they
wrought in the industry."
Philip Lombardo, chairman of Citadel Communications Ltd., which
owns television stations in Illinois, Iowa and Nebraska, said most
broadcasters already stayed far below any indecency line and would
not be curtailed by any code.
"Most broadcasters currently operate within a code," Lombardo
said. "They understand what is the proper programming and the
proper response for their community."
The original code was dropped in 1982 under Reagan
administration pressure, on antitrust and First Amendment
grounds.
Commissioner Michael Copps joined Powell in urging the
broadcasters to reinstate it.
"I believe the industry could come together and craft a new
code, perfectly able to pass court muster, and one that would serve
the needs of businesses as well as those of concerned families,"
Copps said.
NAB scheduled its first-ever Summit on Responsible
Programming in response to proposed legislation raising the maximum
fine for indecency from $27,500 to $500,000. The broadcasters also
were responding to public outrage over the infamous
Super Bowl halftime show Feb. 1, which ended with singer Justin Timberline
exposing Janet Jackson's right breast to millions of TV viewers.
The incident generated more than 500,000 complaints.
Fritts said the issue would be around for a while. "It's not
going to be something that is going to be resolved in 30 days," he
said.
Others fear that efforts to curb indecency will run afoul of the
First Amendment.
As Powell appeared earlier Wednesday at a House Appropriations
subcommittee hearing, Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y., decried what he
called an "assault on freedom of speech."
"I think people should have the ability to say what they please,
and I have the ability not to listen to them," Serrano said.
© 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Editor's note:
Bernard Goldberg’s best seller "Arrogance" exposes the media – get it FREE – click here now
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Bush Administration
Corporate Scandals
Media Bias