Congress Leery of Amendment Banning Same-Sex Marriage
NewsMax.com Wires
Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004
WASHINGTON President Bush wants quick election-year
enactment of a constitutional amendment prohibiting gays from
marrying each other, but Republicans in Congress are not rushing to
heed his call.
After Bush's announcement Tuesday, House Majority Leader Tom
DeLay, R-Texas, said it would take time to gauge the level of
support in Congress for a constitutional amendment. He suggested
the difficulty of passing one might cause lawmakers to take a
different approach to preserving marriage as a solely man-woman
union.
"We don't want to do this in haste," DeLay said.
Edwards and Kerry Evasive
The front-runner for the Democrats' presidential nomination,
Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, and his leading rival, Sen. John
Edwards of North Carolina, struggled to make their opposition to
Bush's stance clear as they carefully tiptoed around politically
sensitive turf.
Kerry said he supported civil unions, "and I think that that is
permissible within state law, and it ought to be."
"If he really wants to help married couples, what he should be
doing is helping them resolve their economic problems, their health
care problems," Edwards said while campaigning in Georgia.
Meeting long-held expectations of his most conservative
supporters, Bush argued that same-sex weddings threatened the
institution of marriage, and thus society, and that actions by
several local jurisdictions allowing gay marriage made federal
intervention the only recourse.
"If we are to prevent the meaning of marriage from being
changed forever, our nation must enact a constitutional amendment
to protect marriage in America," the president said. "Marriage
cannot be severed from its cultural, religious and natural roots
without weakening the good influence of society."
Bush called on Congress "to promptly pass and to send to the
states for ratification" an amendment to define marriage as a
union of a man and a woman. He had opposed legalizing civil unions
as governor of Texas, but Bush left the door open for states to do
so now, an alternative that gay rights groups find insufficient.
Bush's conservative supporters who view prohibiting gay marriage
as a priority were thrilled.
"We are delighted the president has stepped forward on this
issue and his announcement serves as a critical catalyst to
energize and organize those who will work diligently to ensure that
marriage remains an institution between one man and one woman,"
said Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of American Center for Law and
Justice, a law firm founded by the Rev. Pat Robertson.
A majority of Americans, sometimes by as much as a 2-1 margin,
oppose legalizing gay marriages. Still, Bush's move could hold
political risks, especially if voters see him as intolerant or
question his self-description as a "compassionate conservative."
Democrats promised to fight the amendment and criticized Bush
for wanting to use the Constitution to take away rights. They said
he was trying change the subject from questions on his leadership,
the economy, his Vietnam-era military service and the failure to
find the weapons of mass destruction he had alleged were in Iraq.
McAuliffe: 'Shameful'
"President Bush is tinkering with America's most sacred
document in a shameful attempt to turn our attention away from his
record as president," said Democratic National Committee Chairman
Terry McAuliffe.
Several GOP lawmakers said they would prefer to see Congress
take a different route rather than amend the Constitution.
Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif., a co-chairman of Bush's campaign in
California in 2000, said he did not support a constitutional
amendment. "I believe that this should go through the courts, and
I think that we're at a point where it's not necessary," he said.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said the matter should be left to the
states, and Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., said changing the
Constitution should be a last resort on almost any issue.
With some conservatives wanting a broader approach than Bush
supports, and others opposing federalizing the issue, DeLay said
it was "going to take some time" to unify those groups and examine
other options.
"Constitutional amendment, I believe that is the ultimate
remedy left for the Congress," he said. "We are looking at other
ways of doing it."
Log Cabin Republicans, a gay GOP group, worried that Bush
risked alienating the 1 million gays who voted for him
in 2000 by pushing for the constitutional amendment.
"We believe that this is a move to start a culture war, fueled
and pushed by the radical right, that will end up in George Bush's
defeat, and defeat for a lot of good Republicans who are with us on
equality," Mark Mead, the group's political director, said in an
interview with AP Radio.
Editor's note:
Have an Opinion About This? Click Here to Send an URGENT PriorityGram Today
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
2004 Elections
Bush Administration
DNC
George W. Bush
RNC
Sen. John McCain
Sen John Kerry