FEC Issues New Limits on Big Donations
NewsMax.com Wires
Thursday, Feb. 19, 2004
WASHINGTON The Federal Election Commission has set new
limits on non-party political groups raising big corporate and
union checks, making its first foray into an issue with high stakes
for Democrats and Republicans in this fall's elections.
The commission voted 4-2 Wednesday to place some restrictions on
outside political groups that register with the FEC, a ruling that
will limit how they can use corporate and union contributions for
election activities.
The FEC put off decisions on several larger issues, including
whether the limits should apply to groups that do not register with
the commission but are involved in elections. Campaign finance
watchdogs call many of the new organizations "shadow groups" and
contend they are trying to keep soft money flowing into federal
elections despite the new law.
The commission will consider the question of whether limits
should apply to such groups next month in a formal rule-making
process that could determine how much special-interest money flows
into the elections.
Democrats Attack Their Own 'Reform'
Democrats hope to use the outside groups to conduct
get-out-the-vote drives and other activities their party used to
have soft money to finance, and to make up some of the financial
advantage Republicans have enjoyed under the campaign finance law
that took effect after the 2002 election. The GOP raises millions
of dollars more in the smaller donations the law permits than the
Democrat party does.
How far Wednesday's decision reaches is under debate.
Harold Ickes, raising millions of dollars in large individual
donations to run ads promoting the election of a Democrat
president, said he didn't believe the ruling affected his group
because it wasn't under the FEC's jurisdiction.
Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie, who has
been pressing the FEC to limit soft-money election spending,
said the decision shut down illicit groups "that
operate in the shadows by using unregulated soft money to influence
federal elections."
Ellen Weintraub, a Democrat commissioner, said the ruling
left plenty of flexibility for partisan groups to collect and
spend soft money: corporate, union and unlimited donations.
"You can't stop the flow of money," Weintraub said.
At issue is how the nation's new campaign finance law, which
banned national party committees and federal candidates from
soliciting soft money, affects interest groups still raising the
big checks.
Weintraub said the FEC's decision affected only political groups
registered with the commission and collecting limited individual
donations known as hard money, which they can use for direct
candidate support, such as ads calling for someone's election, and
also raising soft money, donations they can use only for more
limited purposes.
Groups typically must report to the FEC as political committees
if they are contributing to congressional or presidential
candidates or airing ads calling on the public to vote for or
against a candidate.
The commission ruled that when such groups air ads, conduct
get-out-the-vote drives or undertake other activities that promote,
support, attack or oppose only federal candidates, they must use
hard money. If a state or local candidate or the general party
ticket also is mentioned, they can use a mix of hard and soft
money.
Americans for a Better Country, a Republican group that asked
the FEC to issue the opinion Wednesday, said that the ruling restricted
much of what it planned to do but that it would look for ways it can use
soft money to counter Democrat groups' spending in the fall
election.
"We said from the beginning we are going to raise as much money
as we possibly can based on what the commission says we can do,"
said Frank Donatelli, an attorney for the group.
Some lawyers who counsel tax-exempt political groups known as
527s believed the ruling set off cautionary notes for soft money
527s even if they aren't registered with the FEC.
"It would be irresponsible for an attorney to counsel a 527
group that it could spend soft money on messages the FEC has
historically considered federal election activity, or that mentions
the name of a federal candidate, without putting the group and
their donors at considerable risk," said lawyer Ben Ginsberg, a
Republican.
Editor's note:
Urgent: President Bush needs your support – Click Here Now and show your support to your friends and family
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
2004 Elections
Campaign Finance Reform
DNC
RNC