School Mandates Alternate Theory of Evolution
NewsMax.com Wires
Friday, Nov. 12, 2004
DOVER, Pa. When talk at the high school here turns to
evolution, biology teachers have to make time for Charles Darwin as
well as his detractors. With a vote last month, the school board in
rural south-central Pennsylvania community is believed to have
become the first in the nation to mandate the teaching of
"intelligent design," which holds that the universe is so complex
that it must have been created by an unspecified higher power.
Critics call the change in the ninth-grade biology curriculum a
veiled attempt to require public schoolchildren to learn
creationism, a biblical view that credits the origin of
species to God. Schools typically teach evolution, the theory that
Earth is billions of years old and that life forms developed over
millions of years.
Story Continues Below
The state chapter of American Civil Liberties Union is reviewing
the Dover Area School District case. ACLU's chapter in Georgia,
meanwhile, is fighting a suburban Atlanta district's decision to
include a warning sticker in biology textbooks that says evolution
is "a theory, not a fact."
"What Dover has done goes much further than what's happened in
Georgia," said Witold Walczak, legal director of Pennsylvania
ACLU. "As far as we can tell, Dover is the first school district
that has actually mandated intelligent design."
The district enrolls about 2,800 students. It encompasses the
small, rural community of Dover borough, about 20 miles south of
Harrisburg, and a patchwork of farmland and newer suburban
developments in several surrounding townships.
'Fraud'
The revision was spearheaded by school board member William
Buckingham, who heads the board's curriculum committee.
"I think it's a downright fraud to perpetrate on the students
of this district, to portray one theory over and over," said
Buckingham. "What we wanted was a balanced presentation."
Buckingham wanted the board to adopt an intelligent-design
textbook, "Of Pandas and People: The Central Question of
Biological Origins," as a supplement to the traditional biology
book, but no vote was ever taken. A few weeks before the new
science curriculum was approved, 50 copies were anonymously donated
to the high school.
Although Buckingham describes himself as a born-again Christian
and believes in creationism, "This is not an attempt to impose my
views on anyone else," he said.
Two of the dissenting board members, Carol Brown and her
husband, Jeff, were so upset that they resigned after the 6-3 vote
on Oct. 18.
"We have a vocal group within the community who feel very
strongly in an evangelical Christian way that there is no
separation of church and state," Carol Brown said. "Our
responsibility to is to represent the viewpoints of all members of
the community."
Statewide science-curriculum standards approved by
Pennsylvania's state Education Board merely ask students to
"analyze data ... that are relevant to the theory of evolution."
When the standards were revised three years ago, the board
considered language that would have required students to consider
evidence that did not support evolution, but the board dropped the
idea after critics alleged it would have led to the widespread
teaching of creationism in public schools.
Critics of intelligent design contend it is creationism
repackaged in more secular-sounding language.
"Creationism in a cheap tuxedo," said Nicholas Matzke, project
information specialist for the National Center for Science
Education in Oakland, Calif., which advocates for the teaching of
evolution.
Even the Seattle-based Discovery Institute, which supports
scientists studying intelligent-design theory, opposes mandating it
in schools because it is a relatively new concept, said John West,
associate director of the institute's Center for Science and
Culture.
"We're completely against anyone who says you should downgrade
or limit the teaching of evolution," West said.
Dover biology teacher Jennifer Miller said the changes in curriculum
had left her uncertain about how to approach her evolution
lesson.
"If you put the words 'intelligent design' into my curriculum,
then I have to teach it," said Miller, a 12-year veteran. "I'm
not sure what that means as to how in-depth we have to go. ... I'm
looking for more direction from the school board."
Neither Assistant Superintendent Michael Baksa, who oversees the
district's curriculum, nor Superintendent Richard Nilsen responded
to telephone calls and e-mail messages.
Jonathan Tome, whose three sons attend Dover schools, applauded
the measure.
"You can't be hypocritical with these kids, teaching them one
thing but not another," said Tome, 43.
But sophomore Courtney Lawton said she didn't have a problem
learning only about evolution in biology class last year.
"I just think they should keep it the way it is, and they
shouldn't add anything about a higher power," said Lawton, 15.
"People who believe differently, they might feel like they're
being segregated."
© 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Editor's note:
Get David Limbaugh’s best seller "Persecution" about the war on Christians – Click Here for FREE offer
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
School Choice