Georgia Supreme Court Throws Out 'Hate Crimes' Law
NewsMax.com Wires
Monday, Oct. 25, 2004
ATLANTA The Georgia Supreme Court unanimously threw out
the state's "hate crimes" law Monday, calling it over-broad and
"unconstitutionally vague."
The 4-year-old law calls for stiffer criminal penalties for
crimes in which a victim was chosen because of "any bias or
prejudice."
Story Continues Below
The 7-0 ruling came in the case of a man and woman convicted of
an assault on two black men in Atlanta's Little Five Points
neighborhood.
Angela Pisciotta and Christopher Botts were convicted of beating
two black men while screaming racial epithets in 2002. The trial
judge sentenced them to six years in prison, plus an additional two
years under the "hate crimes" law.
Pisciotta and Botts appealed to the state's highest court in
April. Their lawyers argued that the statute should be
struck down because almost any crime involving prejudice falls
under its scope.
The court wrote Monday that it "by no means condon(es)
appellants savage attack on the victims in this case or any conduct
motivated by a bigoted or hate-filled point of view," but that
"the broad language" of the law didn't pass constitutional
muster.
Originally, the legislation defined a "hate crime" as one
motivated specifically by the victim's race, religion, gender,
national origin or sexual orientation.
That language was removed by the Legislature and replaced with a
section defining a "hate crime" as one in which the victim or his
property was targeted because of bias or prejudice.
© 2004 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Editor's note:
Hey: Browse NewsMax’s Online Classifieds for Great Offers – Click Here Now!