Democrat 'Soft Money' Groups Refuse to Explain Evasion of Campaign Finance 'Reform'
NewsMax.com Wires
Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2004
WASHINGTON A House committee chairman on Tuesday gave
Democrats running new "soft money" groups one more chance to
answer questions about their activities before he decides whether
to subpoena them for a hearing.
At issue is whether soft money - corporate, union and unlimited
donations - is illegally finding its way into this year's
high-stakes presidential and congressional elections. A new
campaign law broadly prohibits the use of soft money in federal
elections.
Several interest groups have been formed in recent months to
collect big contributions and conduct get-out-the-vote drives and
other election activities as Democrats and Republicans battle over
control of the White House and Congress.
House Administration Committee Chairman Robert Ney, R-Ohio,
wants the leaders of several of the new groups to appear at a
committee hearing and answer questions about their use of soft
money.
Pro-GOP Groups Not Afraid to Talk
The Democrat groups' leaders so far have refused. They argue that their activities are legal, that the committee lacks the authority to
conduct the investigation, and that the inquiry is being driven by
partisan politics. The heads of two GOP-leaning groups have agreed
to testify.
Ney sent the Democrat activists letters Tuesday asking again
that they cooperate. Ney says his committee, which oversees federal
elections, has a responsibility to see whether the new campaign law
is being followed.
If they again refuse to testify, Ney will decide whether to
subpoena them, spokesman Brian Walsh said.
Ney also asked the groups to give the committee any documents
they have involving soft money and correspondence with national
party officials and federal candidates and officeholders. He told
the groups not to destroy any documents that could be relevant.
Ney set no deadline for their responses.
Ney's letter went to three groups involved in the presidential
race - America Votes, America Coming Together and Partnership
for America's Families - and two active in congressional elections:
New House PAC and Democratic Senate Majority Fund.
Howard Wolfson, founder of New House PAC, said he had not
seen the letter and had no immediate reaction. Jim Jordan, a
spokesman for America Votes, America Coming Together and
Partnership for America's Families, said the groups were reviewing
Ney's letter and would cooperate with any congressional inquiry
"that is, in fact, fair, equitable, nonpartisan, and not a White
House-orchestrated exercise in election-year politics."
The two GOP groups agreeing to testify are Americans for a
Better Country, focused on the presidential election, and The
Leadership Forum, which has said it will spend at the state and
local level.
The Republican National Committee is urging the Federal Election
Commission to block partisan organizations from using soft money in
get-out-the-vote drives in federal elections. Campaign watchdogs
plan Thursday to announce legal action against several groups.
© 2003 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Editor's note:
Ann Coulter is fighting back – Click here to see her battle
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
2004 Elections
Campaign Finance Reform
DNC
RNC