Turning Lawyers Into Government Spies
Paul Craig Roberts
Thursday, Aug. 14, 2003
When will the first lawyer be arrested, indicted and sent to
prison for failing to help the government convict his client? You can bet it
will be soon. Once the Securities and Exchange Commission, Internal Revenue
Service and U.S. Department of Justice (sic) complete their assault on the
attorney-client privilege, they will rush to make an example of a lawyer,
lest any fail to understand that their new role in life is to serve as
government informants on their clients.
Just as government bureaucrats used the terrorist attacks of
Sept. 11 to assault the Bill of Rights and our constitutional protections,
they are now using "accounting scandals" and "tax evasion" to assault the
attorney-client privilege, a key component of the Anglo-American legal
system that enables a defendant, whether guilty or innocent, to mount a
defense against the overwhelming power of the state.
The assault on the attorney-client privilege began with Jeremy
Bentham, the first modern tyrant, who saw his role in life as the antagonist
of the great English jurist William Blackstone. Bentham argued that the
legal principles that protect the innocent, enshrined in English law as "the
Rights of Englishmen," were no longer needed and served only to protect
criminals.
Bentham thought that Blackstone's principles were fine in their
day, as they served to protect the people from the tyranny of autocratic
kings. But now that government was controlled by the people's
representatives in Parliament, how could the people tyrannize themselves?
Crime control would be easier, Bentham argued, if police,
prosecutors and judges were free to torture suspects into confessions, force
their attorneys to rat on them and pre-emptively arrest people who might
commit crimes in the future. There was no power that Bentham did not think
government could be trusted with in order to better serve the public good.
In our day, the Benthamite attack on the attorney-client
privilege was revived by Assistant Attorney General Stuart M. Gerson, who
declared the 400-member prominent law firm of Kaye, Scholer "an abettor of
crime" for not ratting on its client, Lincoln S&L owner Charles Keating. The
government froze the assets of the law firm and the personal assets of the
400 partners, an action that coerced the firm and its partners to hand over
a $41 million ransom payment to the government.
Fierce opposition from bar associations and legal authorities
could not prevent the government from succeeding in this act of robber
barony, despite the fact that Keating had not gone to trial or been
convicted of any offense. The law firm was robbed for abetting a crime that
had not been tried or proven.
Many law-and-order conservatives fall in with Benthamite views,
because they believe with Bentham that the function of the justice system is
to convict defendants. Many have expressed their distaste to me of "lawyers
who defend criminals." They overlook that it is the jury that determines
whether the defendant is a criminal. If we assume that police and
prosecutors are always right, there is no point of a trial.
Police and prosecutors are not always right. They make tens of
thousands of mistakes. Some experts estimate that there are 200,000 innocent
Americans in prisons. There is a constant flow of convicted "murderers" and
"rapists" being released on the basis of DNA evidence that proves their
innocence. It would be a sobering event for law-and-order conservatives to
become caught up in the legal system.
Alexis de Tocqueville believed that American lawyers would not
tolerate attacks on the attorney-client relationship, but bar association
president Alfred P. Carlton Jr. has already collapsed, lining up with the
government against his profession and the presumption of innocence.
The sacking of the attorney-client privilege can only produce a
nightmare. Many white-collar crimes and securities regulations are so vague
and arcane that no one knows for sure what they mean. Their meanings are
usually argued out in settlements or trials. What will happen now is that
any attorney who fails to guess in advance the regulator's interpretation of
the regulation can be charged with helping his client commit fraud.
The same holds for "questionable" tax shelters. It is a matter
of interpretation. Any attorney who fails to anticipate the IRS bureaucrat's
interpretation becomes an abettor of fraud.
During the administration of George Bush I, the Benthamite
attack on the attorney-client privilege was revived in force. Now during the
administration of Bush II, lawyers are being stripped of their protective
role and turned into instruments of government prosecution.
These are the measures of a police state. Look around, fellow
Americans, and recognize the Benthamite face that the unbridled pursuit of
criminals has placed on your "justice system."
Dr. Roberts' latest book, "The Tyranny of Good Intentions," has been published by Prima Publishers.
Copyright 2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Bush Administration
Editor's note:
Have an Opinion About This? Click Here to Send an URGENT PriorityGram Today