The March to Save Saddam
David Horowitz
Wednesday, Feb. 19, 2003
Millions of people poured into the streets of cities from Melbourne to
New York on Saturday, Feb. 15, to protect Saddam Hussein from an
imminent American attempt to disarm and dethrone him and disable his
arsenal of chemical, biological and proto-nuclear weapons.
They professed concern about Iraqi children (bearing mock bodies to symbolize
their alarm) but marched in solidarity with Palestinians and Arabs who
kill their own children by strapping bombs to them and telling them to
blow up other children – Jew children – so that they will go to heaven
and their families will receive a $25,000 reward.
In politics intentions count for nothing; actions are what matter. If
the marchers are successful, Saddam will survive to be stronger than
ever. All over the Middle East and the Muslim world fanatical haters of
Americans, Christians and Jews will take heart from Saddam's successful
defiance, will draw the conclusion that the West is weak, and will be
inspired to commit new atrocities against its most defenseless citizens.
All the marches were organized by supporters of Communist and other
totalitarianisms, and by the fifth column agents of Islamo-fascism. All
the demonstrations promoted Iraqi war propaganda – myths about starving
children and about alleged mercenary interests behind American policy;
all of them had one purpose – to disarm the American force already in
the Middle East and allow Saddam to fight another day.
It is true that some of the marchers were well-intentioned or at least
not so blind yet that they could look past the evil that is the regime
in Iraq. What of it? What could be more irrelevant than splitting
critical hairs when your country is under attack and your actions serve
the aggressors?
During the Cold War there were many intelligent souls on the left who
joined the "peace" demonstrations in the West organized by Communists
and their supporters, but described themselves as
"anti-anti-Communists."
They meant by this that they knew that Communism
was bad, but were against the cold warriors who were locked in mortal
combat with the Soviet empire. The Gorbachev regime in their eyes was
bad, but Ronald Reagan was a "warmonger" and therefore worse.
The anti-anti-Communists may have been good at stimulating critical
discussion. A democracy can always benefit from dissenters, because no
faction has a monopoly on truth. But in practice the decent opponents of the
Cold War encouraged the Communists to hold onto their slave empire and
resist the pressures of the free world.
In the end it was Ronald Reagan
and the Cold Warriors he led who stymied the Communists' ambitions,
brought down the Soviet empire and liberated more than a billion people.
In the scales of that historic struggle, when it came to mobilizing the
military resources that backed the enemy down, the anti-anti-Communists
ultimately put their weight on the other side of the scale.
During the Vietnam War – the clearest parallel to the present events
– the anti-war movement was organized by Communists who wanted the
other side to win. The non-Communists who joined their marches, whatever
their intentions, served the same practical end. America was divided at
home and these divisions eventually forced its armies to retreat from the
field of battle.
As a result, the Communists won and proceeded to
slaughter two and a half million peasants in Indo-China between 1975 and
1978. This is the scenario that the people (mostly the same people) who
led Saturday's protests hope to accomplish: the defeat of the
West and the triumph of Islamo-fascism and its friends.
Today's "peace" movement – the innocent-intentioned along with the
malevolent rest – is a fifth column army in our midst working for the
other side. Already their leaders have warned that if the United States
remains determined to oppose this totalitarian evil and stay its
intended course, they will act within our borders to "disrupt the flow
of normal life" and sabotage the war.
This is ultimately the most
ominous threat Americans face. Abroad we can conquer any foe. The real
danger lies at home.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Saddam Hussein/Iraq
War on Terrorism
Editor's note:
Revealed: The Terrorists Living Among Us