Feds' Prosecution of Terrorism Often Fizzles
NewsMax.com Wires
Monday, Dec. 8, 2003
More: Judge Unleashes Anti-military Bomber Wannabe and Ashcroft Silent on Coddling of Would-Be Terrorist.
WASHINGTON The Department of Justice has sharply increased
prosecution of terrorism cases since the Sept. 11 attacks, but many fizzled and few produced significant prison time, a new
study finds.
About 6,400 people were referred by investigators for criminal
charges involving terror in the two years after the attacks, but
fewer than one-third were charged and only 879 were
convicted, according to government records reviewed by Syracuse
University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse.
Two Weeks in Prison
The median prison sentence was just 14 days, said the study by
clearinghouse co-directors David Burnham and Susan P. Long,
released Sunday. Only five people were sentenced to 20 years or
more.
Critics seized on the numbers to question whether Attorney
General John Ashcroft and other top law enforcement officials have
been overstating the success of their anti-terrorism efforts.
Nearly every time Ashcroft talks about the subject, he reads a long
list of statistics on arrests and convictions to buttress his
contention that great progress is being made.
Sen. Charles Grassley, a senior member of the Senate Judiciary
Committee with oversight of the FBI and Justice Department, said
the report "raises questions about the accuracy of the
department's claims about terrorism enforcement."
"This report shows that despite the focus on terrorism-related
crimes, most of the people accused of terrorism involvement are
getting little jail time, if at all," said Grassley, R-Iowa.
Justice Department and FBI officials said the study was rooted in
past conceptions of crime and punishment and did not reflect the
reality that would-be terrorists seek to blend into society until
they are ready to strike.
Lack of lengthy prison terms in many cases can be explained by
the effort by prosecutors to stop would-be terrorists long before
they are ready to attack, often charging them with lesser offenses,
such as identity theft, document fraud and immigration violations.
Prosecutors feel it is better to get suspects off the streets
and press them for information than wait for events that could
produce harsher penalties. They also said the study made no
mention of the value of intelligence collection and the need to
reward cooperation with lesser sentences.
'Shorter Sentences but Greater Prevention'
"The whole point is to disrupt terrorism at an early stage
instead of letting the conspiracy fully hatch," said Viet Dinh, a
former top Justice Department official under Attorney General John
Ashcroft who now teaches law at Georgetown University. "We cannot
take the risk of the conspiracy taking place. What you get is
shorter sentences but greater prevention."
In other words, for every would-be "shoe bomber" such as
Richard Reid, serving a life sentence for trying to light an
explosive on a Paris-to-Miami flight last year, there are many
more suspects such as the group of Yemeni-Americans from
Lackawanna, N.Y., convicted of supporting terrorism by
briefly attending al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan.
"This administration's strategy of preventing terrorism has
helped protect American for over two years," Justice Department
spokesman Mark Corallo said.
According to the study, about 874 cases were pending as of Sept.
30, including some that might produce longer sentences. In October,
for example, two members of an Oregon group were sentenced to 18
years each in prison for attempting to travel to Afghanistan and
fight U.S. forces there.
Still, critics of Justice Department's anti-terrorism policies say
the study lifts the veil on what they consider large-scale
government deception aimed at reassuring an American public fearful
of more attacks.
ACLU Complains of 'Hype'
"This punches a huge hole in the hype the Justice Department
has been engaged in," said Timothy Edgar, legislative counsel for
American Civil Liberties Union. "They are calling people
terrorists, on a massive scale, who aren't terrorists."
According to the study, charges were filed against 2,001 of the
6,400 people recommended for prosecution since the attacks.
Authorities declined to prosecute 1,554. Some 2,845 of the
referrals were pending as of Sept. 30.
Of the 879 people convicted, 373 went to prison, and 506 did not.
Of those sentenced to prison, 250 got less than a year, 100 got
less than five years, and just 23 were sentenced to five years or
more.
During the two years before Sept. 11, 2001, 24 people were
sentenced to five or more years in prison on comparable
terror offenses, the study said.
The study also found that:
Prosecutions of individuals suspected of ties to one category,
international terrorism, jumped from 142 in the two years before
Sept. 11, 2001, to 748 in the two years after. Yet only three
people in that category since the attacks have drawn sentences of
five years or more, compared with six during the earlier period.
More than 260 people convicted since Sept. 11 of
terrorism offenses were sentenced to the time that had
already spent in jail awaiting disposition of their case.
About 35 percent of criminal referrals made by investigators
were declined by prosecutors because of lack of evidence or no
obvious federal crime had been committed.
___
© 2003 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Editor's note:
Have an Opinion About This? Click Here to Send an URGENT PriorityGram Today
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Al-Qaeda
Bush Administration
Homeland/Civil Defense
War on Terrorism