Anti-religion 'Grinches'
Jerry Falwell
Thursday, Dec. 4, 2003
The anti-religion Grinches are out in full force this Christmas season. In
fact, Christmas has become a dirty word in many areas of society as groups
like the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation
of Church and State continue to instill their vision of a Godless public
square on our nation.
Mathew Staver, president and general counsel for the Orlando, Fla.-based
Liberty Council, is on the front lines of the religious freedom battlefield.
He has reported on just a few religious freedom outrages going on right now.
In Wisconsin, for example, public school officials have mandated that
students must amend "religious" words in Christmas carols they will sing
during a concert. The students have been prohibited from using words that
refer to "Jesus" or "God" and instead must substitute "secular" words and
phrases.
In Michigan, public school officials recently separated all "religious"
books on the holidays (Hanukkah and Christmas) and placed them in a separate
room. These books are now out of sight and out of reach of the students,
Mr. Staver said.
Public school administrators in Georgia have instructed employees that they
may not conduct any Christmas-related activities, including reading from
Christmas books or making Christmas decorations. Even red and white candy
canes have been barred because of the religious story behind the origin of
the Christmas treat.
Our friends at the Citrus Heights, Calif.-based Pacific Justice Institute
reported that a high school in Fountain Valley informed students that they
could not wear clothing expressing religious messages (such as "Jesus is the
Way"), even though Muslim students were permitted to wear headscarves.
And the folks at the Ann Arbor, Mich.-based Thomas More Law Center have
brought a case against New York City schools after officials barred
Christmas displays while simultaneously authorizing Jewish menorahs and the
Islamic star and crescent during their respective holidays.
Recently, Mat Staver announced that Liberty Counsel had launched a
nationwide campaign to prevent blatant religious discrimination during the
holidays. Liberty Counsel will bring lawsuits against any governmental
agency that discriminates against the public displays of religious symbols
or songs, and has also announced that it will defend any governmental entity
that abides by the Constitution and allows the equal expression of religious
views.
He could have his hands full because instances similar to those above are
taking place across the nation.
It's important for Americans to understand what is constitutional in regard
to public Christmas displays.
Publicly sponsored nativity scenes on public property are constitutional as
long as there is a secular symbol of the holiday that appears as part of the
display.
In other words, says Mr. Staver, the government may publicly display
depictions of Mary, Joseph and Jesus if the display includes a depiction of
Santa Claus, for example.
In addition, students in public schools may sing Christian Christmas carols
such as "Silent Night" or "Away in the Manger" as long as they also sing
secular songs about Rudolph or Frosty.
On the other hand, privately sponsored nativity scenes displayed by private
citizens or groups are constitutional and do not require any secular
symbols.
Moreover, Mr. Staver says that individual students may sing Christmas carols
relaying the message of Christ as part of an overall presentation where
other students are allowed to sing secular carols. In addition, public
schools may not prohibit access to religious books; such action discriminates
against the religious viewpoint of the message contained in the books.
And public employers may not discriminate against staff workers by
prohibiting Christmas celebrations.
Liberty Counsel has a history of successfully defending religious
individuals against persecution and bullying by employers and schools. Last
year, the organization successfully represented six Massachusetts high
school students who were suspended for distributing candy canes bearing a
message about the Christian origin of the candy.
In the case of Westfield
High School L.I.F.E. Club v. City of Westfield, 249 F. Supp.2d 98, 124 (D.
Mass. 2003), the court struck down the school policy, reinstated the
students, and required the school to pay almost $30,000 in damages.
Many people want to outlaw Christmas and the message of Christ's unspeakable
gift of His only Son to mankind, but they don't have legal grounds to enact
their narrow and deceptive course of action against those who publicly
embrace this wondrous story.
Individuals who face religious discrimination this Christmas season should
contact Mat Staver at Liberty Counsel. The organization has an assembly of
attorneys who practice law across America, often without charge.
Liberty Counsel: 407-875-2100 or http://www.lc.org
Editor's note:
Charlton Heston presents "The Bible" - Click Here Now