America Under Siege
David Horowitz
Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2003
America's enemies within turned out in force on Saturday in Washington,
D.C., and San Francisco under the auspices of the Communist Workers World
Party operating under its front organization, A.N.S.W.E.R. Once again
the demonstrators pretended to be peace activists who found violence
abhorrent, and a willing media played along with the charade.
Neither the
New York Times nor the Los Angeles Times nor any media I saw identified
the organizers as Communists, who have a long record of support for world
terror and its leaders including the Ayatollah Khomeini, Kim Jong-il,
Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein.
As reported by the unfiltered cameras of C-SPAN, the pretense, in fact,
was pretty thin. One of the featured speakers was a spokesman for the
narco-terrorists in Colombia who opened his rant (all the speeches fell
into this category) with "We have to stop America's war against the
people of Iraq, and the people of Palestine, Colombia and the world."
America is supporting the government of Colombia against a brutal
communist guerrilla force that has been waging civil war there for half
a century.
Come to think of it, America's enemies in Palestine are the
terrorist organizations Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the al-Aksa Martyrs
terrorist brigade. And in Iraq, there is a dictator who has slaughtered
hundreds of thousands of his own people and has attempted to swallow the
country of Kuwait.
The spokesman for the Colombian narco-terrorists was
quite candid (and why not, since he knows that the American media will
present him as a "peace activist" anyway). "As revolutionaries," he said
to the crowd, "as progressives, we have to resist American imperialism."
Then came Imam Mussa from the mosque Masjid al-Islam. Like most of the
cast assembled by A.N.S.W.E.R., the Imam had also been a speaker at the
Millions for Reparations March last August – which was more about
denouncing America as a racist, imperialist monster than making a case
for compensation for any specific injustices (See my report,
"Reparations Buffoons on the Washington Mall" – http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Printable.asp?ID=2436)
Here is a sample of the
rhetoric at that march from Malik Zulu Shabazz (one of the few who was
not at the "peace" event):
"The president wants to talk about a
terrorist named bin Laden. I don't want to talk about bin Laden. I want
to talk about a terrorist called George Washington. I want to talk about
a terrorist called Rudy Giuliani. The real terrorists have always been
the United Snakes of America."
When he got going, the Imam Mussa dotted the i's and crossed any t's
that the narco-terrorist spokesman had missed, telling the crowd that
the regime change they wanted was in Washington, not Bagdhad, and that
they really didn't want a regime change at all.
"We 're calling for a
System change," he said. Revolution. "We won't get any justice as long
as that criminal Congress is up there. We're calling for revolution.
It's revolution time, brothers and sisters. We have to get rid of greedy
murderers and imperialists like George Bush in the White House."
The
Imam then led the crowd – are you ready for this – in the chant the
suicide bombers use as they blow up innocent men, women and children:
"Allahu Ahkbar! Allahu Ahkbar! Allahu Akhbar!"
Democratic New York City Councilman and former Black Panther Charles
Baron was also a speaker at the Millions for Reparations March, where he
announced he needed to assault a white person for his "mental health."
On this occasion he kept his racism in check, but not his rhetoric.
"If
you're looking for the Axis of Evil," he raved, "then look inside the
belly of this beast." He went on to attack America's "monopoly
capitalists" (a technical term which veterans of the left will recognize
as the mark of Communist and Maoist sectarians), who of course are the
puppeteers pulling the president's strings.
Damu Smith, head of Black Voices for Peace, returned to Baron's theme
and made it specific. "Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld," he said, "that's the
Axis of Evil."
Larry Holmes, "co-founder" of the sponsoring organization, who also hosted
the Millions for Reparations March, then led the crowd in chants to free
two convicted murderers, Mumia Abu Jamal and Jamin al Alamin (H. Rap
Brown). This was a set piece also during the Millions for Reparations
March.
It would be reassuring if one could report that a single speaker or face
in the televised crowd dissented from the stew of anti-American,
anti-white, anti-Jew hatred or the violent incitements, but not one did.
The crowd relished the show and was in total sympathy with the message.
Another striking fact about this march in support of global terrorism
was the presence of prominent Democrat officials on the platform. In San
Francisco, the most powerful Democrat legislator in the state, John
Burton, screamed, "The president is full of sh*t!" and said that the president
is "f*cking with us," while encouraging the general sentiment that
America rather than Iraq is the outlaw state.
In Washington, Democratic
hopeful Al Sharpton attended and ex-congresswoman Cynthia McKinney of Georgia
read a speech with the following claim: "In no other country on the
planet do so many people have so little as they do in this country."
This from a person who notoriously commandeered a taxpayer-funded
limousine to take her from her townhouse one block to her congressional
offices every morning.
More disturbing by far was the presence of two of the most powerful
Democrats in Congress, the potential head of the Ways and Means
Committee, Charles Rangel, and the potential head of the Judiciary
Committee, John Conyers, who is of course the author of the Reparations
Bill and the icon of the Communist organizers of both marches.
Rangel's
appearance was especially troubling because he has been a nightly face
on TV news shows presenting himself as a patriot and a veteran (he
served 50 years ago in Korea) who wanted a military draft so that all
America would be involved in the nation's defense. His critics thought
he had other agendas, like using conscription to sabotage the war
effort. Apparently his critics were correct.
Americans who care about their country and its future should think about
the following. This anti-American pro-terrorist movement is now larger
than the anti-Vietnam pro-Communist "peace" movement was until the very
end of the sixties. Yet there is no draft.
Before the draft the
anti-Vietnam movement was very, very small. Its demonstrations were
numbered in the hundreds of participants, not even the thousands. The
first big manifestation of the anti-American left was the Stop the Draft
March in Oakland in 1965, which was four years after America's
involvement in Vietnam got serious.
The second thing Americans should think about is the fact that this
anti-American support movement for America's enemies has deep roots in
the Democratic Party. I am a firm believer in the two-party system. I
find it extremely worrying, therefore, that one party can no longer be
trusted with the nation's security.
This problem will not be easily
fixed. But it won't be fixed at all unless attention is drawn to it, and
we cannot do that unless we stop the charade of calling this a "peace"
movement and recognize instead that it is an anti-American movement to
divide this country in the face of its enemies and give aid and comfort
to those who would destroy us.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
War on Terrorism
Editor's note:
Revealed: The Terrorists Living Among Us