Socialist Lobotomies
Notra Trulock
Monday, July 29, 2002
During a 1970s trip to the Havana General Psychiatric Hospital, a group of visiting American leftists was told that this hospital led the world in the percentage of
patients lobotomized. The leftists had already encountered "perfectly sane" homosexuals in the mental wards, because the Castro regime believed that homosexuality
was a disease justifying commitment.
Some leftists were horrified and exclaimed that this was "exactly what we’re working against at home." But one retorted,
"We have to understand that there are differences between capitalist lobotomies and socialist lobotomies."
Reading his 2001 memoir, "Commies," one wonders if the
old left, the new left and the leftover left characters Ronald Radosh describes might not have received "socialist lobotomies" themselves.
"Commies" is the story of a "red diaper" baby’s evolution through a succession of leftist causes in postwar America – the Rosenberg case, McCarthyism, Castro and
Cuba, the anti-war movement, the Sandinistas, and on and on. Each "cause" represented yet another opportunity to convert America to socialism or Maoism or
whatever intellectual fad was then in vogue on the left.
Radosh’s pedigree was impeccable; he attended schools and summer camps for "little reds" and inevitably
drifted into that ultimate refuge for lefties – the university.
Radosh’s main "cause" was the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg atomic spy case. For Radosh and the left, the Rosenberg case was nothing more than a government
conspiracy, with anti-Semitic overtones, to stamp out the left and bring fascism to America.
Radosh does note the ambivalent stance of the U.S. Communist Party
on this case initially. Still taking their direction from Moscow, the Party did not adopt the Rosenbergs’ cause until Stalin hit on the case as a way to distract attention
from his own purge of "anti-Zionists" in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, particularly in Czechoslovakia.
Ironically, after Watergate, the Rosenbergs’ sons used the Freedom of Information Act to petition the government to release its records on the case. These newly
declassified documents shattered Radosh’s youthful illusions about their innocence, however, and set him on the path of rethinking many of the leftist myths that had
guided his life.
His account of the importance of the Rosenbergs’ "martyrdom" explains much about the left. Leftists live according to a set of "myths." The Rosenbergs were
framed, Ho Chi Minh was a nationalist patriot, Castro – and later the Sandinistas – would create humane, truly democratic governments. The only thing standing in the
way of true progress is the corporate-sponsored American government, which repeatedly prosecutes innocent people, suppresses national liberation movements and despoils the environment.
Radosh observes that leftists spent most of their time putting out journals and newsletters. These journals, and the leftist movement in general, spawned several
prominent players in the American media and, later on, a remarkable number of members of the Clinton administration.
In his first term, Clinton intended to appoint
Johnetta Cole as secretary of education. But she was soon identified as a leader of the Venceremos Brigades and a member of the U.S. Peace Council, a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Soviet-run World Peace Council. Her most outspoken defender was Jesse Jackson, who claimed that the opposition to Cole’s appointment
came from "Jewish complaints." Clinton eventually backed away from nominating her.
Another leftist star, Michael Lerner, became Hillary Clinton’s guru during her
"politics of meaning" phase.
One left-wing journal, In These Times, produced John B. Judis, now a senior editor of The New Republic, as well as Sidney Blumenthal, who became a
Washington Post reporter. He later became Bill Clinton’s chief hatchet man with the media.
Another left-wing star, David Gelber, was the staff director for the
massive May Day 1971 anti-war march on Washington before moving to network television news. After a stint producing for Dan Rather, he ended up as Ed
Bradley’s senior producer at "60 Minutes."
And then there is Robert Scheer, contributing editor to the Los Angeles Times and The Nation, syndicated columnist and senior lecturer at the Annenberg School
for Communication. Scheer’s current bio omits some intriguing highlights, however. He visited Kim Il Sung’s North Korean paradise and told Radosh, in a taped
interview, that Kim had created a true path to socialism.
Scheer’s views were too much even for Pacifica radio, which refused to run the interview. Scheer later
became Wen Ho Lee’s staunchest defender.
The elite media didn't like Radosh's book. The Washington Post reminded readers that he went on to champion the "terrorist Contras in Nicaragua" and the
New York Times snidely titled its review "Don’t Steal this Book" – a play on "Steal this Book," a volume written by Abbie Hoffman, another old lefty.
See NewsMax's special offer for "Commies" – Click Here.
A product that might interest you:
"The New Thought Police: Inside the Left’s Assault on Free Speech and Free Minds"