Cardinal Law and Media's Real Agenda
Fr. Michael Reilly
Monday, April 22, 2002
Editor's note: This is the second in a series of articles by Fr. Michael Reilly on Life Issues. See part one, Catholics and Contraception.
Nearly two years ago to the day, deafening applause thundered throughout St.
Patrick's
Cathedral as more than 2,000 devoted Catholics buried their beloved
John
Cardinal O'Connor. It was Bernard Cardinal Law of Boston who hurled the
final
lightning bolt from the pulpit of St. Patrick's on behalf of his good friend
John O'Connor.
"The Catholic Church is unequivocally pro-life," he defiantly proclaimed.
Then it began.
To the horror of the Clintons and the other pro-abortion politicians, the
entire
congregation sprang up from the pews and applauded mercilessly and
unabatingly. In
the midst of this, they desperately hoped that this ovation would end, but it
did not. It
continued for several minutes, a veritable eternity for an image-conscious
politician.
The liberals have never forgiven Cardinal Law for this insult. I cannot help
but think that
there is some element of payback at work in the media assault against the
Catholic
Church in general and Cardinal Law in particular. I am not passing off
legitimate
problems in the Church as mere media bias, but I am questioning the media's
motives.
The Catholic Church is public enemy No. 1 to the abortion industry,
something
which makes this priest proud to don a Roman collar. In my opinion, the
wholesale
slaughter of innocent babies is nothing short of demonic.
Modern advances in embryology clearly establish that we are dealing with
human life in
the womb. Even in 1967, Planned Parenthood acknowledged, "Abortion kills
the life
of the baby after it has begun."
This sets the stage for the real struggle.
The Catholic
Church teaches that the right to life of the unborn baby depends upon what it
is: a
human being created in the image and likeness of Almighty God. Therefore, one
may
never directly, deliberately and intentionally abort a baby.
In contrast, American law dictates that the right to life of the unborn baby
depends upon
the choice of its mother. It makes no difference why she chooses to abort –
it is simply
her right.
A recent survey of 1,900 women who had abortions revealed that:
- 16 percent had abortions because they were concerned about how a child would change
their lives.
- 21 percent were not ready for the responsibility.
- 21 percent could not afford the baby.
- 11 percent felt that they were not mature enough.
- 8 percent had all the children they wanted.
- 4 percent listed other reasons.
- 3 percent indicated the health of the mother.
- 3 percent indicated the health of the baby.
- 1 percent cited rape or incest..
In other words, a human being's life depends upon its mother's bank account,
level of
maturity or general mood.
My question is, if the right to life of the
unborn baby
depends upon the mother's whim, what about the life of a newborn baby? Or a
handicapped baby? Or an elderly woman?
Ultimately, we must face facts. Abortion providers make millions of dollars
in a virtually
unregulated industry. Abortion clinics target poor, minority girls for
pregnancy and
abortion and collect money from states that pay for these abortions to the
tune of
millions of dollars each year.
Unfortunately, however, the cost is not
measured in mere
dollars and cents; there is a great human cost.
Once we devalue one human life, we devalue all human life. Pope Paul VI in
Humanae
Vitae in 1968 predicted this development. He argued that the widespread use
of
artificial contraception would lead to more abortions.
Once man arrogates to
himself the
right to determine whether life can begin (contraception), it will become
easy for man to
arrogate to himself the right to determine whether life should continue once
it has begun.
Thus we have opened the door to abortion, euthanasia, infanticide and a host
of other
crimes against the dignity of the human person.
Contraception and abortion have opened the legendary Pandora's box.
Enlightened
man will sit in judgment on the value of each and every human life as we
contemplate
"ending the suffering" of the handicapped, the elderly and the ill.
As
scientists are
pondering cloning human beings for "spare parts," can we really doubt that
there is
something seriously wrong?
Since Sept. 11, "God Bless America" has become a very popular song. I
wonder
how God can bless America when we sanction the murder of 1.5 million of His
precious
children each year, offering them up on an altar to a god called choice.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Catholic Scandal
Media Bias
A product that might interest you:
Find Out What the Pope Really Believes