Catholics and Contraception
Fr. Michael Reilly
Monday, April 15, 2002
Editor's note: This is the first in a series of articles by Fr. Michael Reilly on Life Issues.
The vicious assault of the media on the Catholic Church and the priesthood speaks
volumes: It means we must be striking a nerve. Please do not misunderstand me: I am
not brushing off legitimate problems as media hype, but the reaction of the media is more
than a bit disingenuous, especially if we compare their treatment of the Church to their
treatment of the Boy Scouts.
The continuous teaching of the Church on certain moral principles frustrates the media
and for this reason, they are making a frontal assault against the Catholic Church. The
Church is a target because the Church is a threat to everything that they hope to
accomplish in this culture war.
The Church cannot be silent in the face of this vicious assault. Now more than ever, the
Church must continue to be the voice of Jesus Christ to a world and a society which has
become depraved. For this reason, I would like to address several of the most pivotal and
controversial teachings of the Catholic Church, beginning with artificial birth control.
For 1,900 years all Christendom was united in its condemnation of this practice. St. Paul
even spoke against it. In 1930, at the Lambeth Conference, the Anglican Church opened
the door to artificial birth control and other Protestant groups followed. Pope Pius XI
immediately reiterated traditional Catholic teaching on this matter in his encyclical Casti
Connubi.
By the time of the Second Vatican Council, there was mounting pressure for the Catholic
Church to join the other denominations in sanctioning artificial birth control. Pope Paul
VI reserved judgement and appointed a special papal commission to study
the matter, focusing on two questions: Can the Church change this teaching on artificial
birth control, and if so, should the Church change the teaching?
The commission was sharply divided and a small majority actually favored changing the
position. Media pressure was intense, but Pope Paul VI still courageously issued
Humanae Vitae in 1968, boldly defending the Church's traditional teaching on artificial
birth control.
The encyclical is actually a marvelous instruction on marriage and would greatly benefit
all married couples. The pope explains that the marriage act serves two inter-connected
purposes: the transmission of human life and the expression of married love. Any
attempt to suppress either of these aspects is an attempt to change the very nature of the
marriage act itself, a grievous offense to the Creator.
Couples who have serious reason to space the births may have relations during the
infecund periods and abstain from relations when conception is a possibility. The pope
called on Catholic scientists to educate couples in this practice, and the result was natural
family planning. Catholic hospitals around the world offer instruction in NFP and the
results are magnificent. When used correctly, it is more than 99 percent effective.
The pope also warned the world of the damage that widespread use of artificial birth
control would inflict on society. He explained how it would contribute to an increase in
marital infidelity, an increase in the divorce rate and an increase in abortion. Many
advocates of birth control had argued that birth control would prevent unwanted
pregnancies, thus decreasing the incidence of abortion.
Pope Paul VI, however, was able to see the bigger picture. Once man arrogated to
himself dominion over human life, there would be no limit to his transgressions. If man
can decide whether life should begin (contraception) he could also decide whether it
should continue (abortion).
As Congress debates creating embryos to harvest stem cells, can we really doubt the pope's
vision?
The Reverend Michael Reilly is a priest with the Archdiocese of New York.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Media Bias
A product that might interest you:
Find Out What the Pope Really Believes