California Governor's Race: Commissar Davis and the People's Press
Patrick Mallon
Monday, Oct. 21, 2002
This article is the latest in the ongoing weekly series on the California governor's race. See previous articles:
So You Want to Steal an Election? (10/14)
Davis Slams Property Owners on 9/11 (10/7)
Only Vote Fraud Can Save Davis Now (9/30)
Is Simon Taking a Dive? (9/23)
The Tide Is Turning (9/16)
Davis and Apologists Fooling Themselves (9/9)
The Farce That Is Sacramento (9/3)
A Democratic Party Art Form - Inventing Voters (8/26)
Tammany Hall's Next Target - Simon's Faith (8/16)
California Governor's Race: Defying the Lies as Bombs Fly (8/9)
Stealth Agenda Trumps Academic Success in Schools (8/2)
Simon Survives Attacks, Davis Cons for Cash (7/26)
Paralyzed From Facing Reality (7/19)
California: Wanted! An Ethical Governor. Apply Within (7/15)
With no surprise (one wonders why they invented six months of
"reporting" to deliver a conclusion arrived at a year ago), the L.A. Times
this week endorsed Commissar Davis for governor.
As the Pravda in a one-paper city, the Times said:
"The choice is clear: Davis is the only candidate with the experience
and knowledge of government needed to serve as the state's chief
executive. The Times endorses Davis for reelection to a second term Nov.
5."
The choice is clear? Really? Never a doubt, huh? What were the criteria –
undermining English-only in failing schools?
Experience? You mean like turning a $10 billion surplus into a $25 billion
deficit in three years?
Knowledge of government? That must mean the ability to shake down
government officials. By extension, every California taxpayer
contributes more than they realize to the Davis re-election campaign,
like it or not. Prison guards, coastal commission, Board of Regents,
teachers unions, pension officials (among many others) all get paid by
us, and all pay Davis millions to "cover their bets."
What would be enlightening is for the Times to disclose when they last
endorsed ANY Republican candidate.
So, What Does the Times Revere in a Candidate?
The following is a list of facts on Gray Davis the Times is apparently
OK with:
* Former governor Jerry Brown's liberal appointees drive Davis policies
(Davis was Brown's chief of staff). Mary Nichols, one of then-Governor
Brown's leading environmental advisers, is now the Davis
administration's Resources Secretary. Ms. Nichols has called for "$5 a
gallon gasoline." This goes well with anti-SUV Rob Reiner and the Sierra
Club gang.
* Davis declared last year that a six-mile section of the 210 freeway
would be "the last freeway built in California." How that works with
exploding population growth is anyone's guess.
* On Sept. 11 this year, the governor signed into law AB 2065. One
provision of 2065 attaches a 3 1/3 percent levy on real estate
transactions for sales of second homes (not primary residences) such as
vacation homes, in the form of a withholding of that percentage in
escrow. The money must be paid to the State Franchise Tax Board, and
operates as a tax by "front loading" the fee to Sacramento, then forcing
the parties to attempt to negotiate recovery.
This heist didn't constitute news anywhere in the state – or the country,
for that matter.
* According to former Davis staffer Mosemarie Boyd, Davis is more
interested in re-election than governance. "The top person in the Davis
administration works in the governor's campaign office where he's been
since the 1998 campaign. Garry South is running the state government."
* AB 537, the "California Student Safety and Violence Prevention Act,"
was signed by the governor in 2000. It changed the education code by
adding ACTUAL or PERCEIVED sexual orientation and gender identity to the
nondiscrimination policy.
The state now defines gender as "a person's actual sex or perceived sex
and includes a person's perceived identity, appearance or behavior,
whether or not that identity, appearance, or behavior is different from
that traditionally associated with a person's sex at birth."
You've got to be kidding.
Davis Supporters Smiling Through Clenched Teeth
Davis negatives, even within his own party, are astronomical. But this
doesn't stop the Times, as it doesn't stop most on the fascist left,
from inventing a reality and begging a result.
The governor, adopting now the role of Good Commissar, says in his
latest TV ads: "You may not agree with everything I do, but I'm working
hard for California."
While a state deemed by corporate executives to be the "least favorable"
in which to operate a business continues to shed thousands of jobs on an
almost weekly basis, nothing at all is said by the maximum leader. Not a
word about tax policies that could help keep businesses from heading to
Nevada and Arizona.
In fact, most businesses have concluded that should Davis be re-elected,
taxes will go through the roof to help the state deal with its debt. And
that means shedding even more workers, closing less profitable
operations, or throwing in the towel altogether.
All California employers and employees' jobs are in jeopardy. What Davis
ignores on the economy should be headline news. This is no recession.
It's a depression. Job losses since 2000 are unprecedented. The fact
that Davis gets a free pass should get everyone's attention.
And what do we get from the man endorsed by the Times? "Abortion, gun
control, environment." Then the next day the mantra switches to "Gun
control, gay rights, diversity, abortion," just to keep everyone
guessing.
The media, the blowhards, the bought-and-paid-for unions, the armies of
"activists" and, yes, the at-the-ready teams of "street money" hustlers
and their vote-buying organization, all … all will be out in force to make
sure the Commissar gets back in office to work his magic.
Any voters who think this election isn't a civil war need to get their
heads examined, or sit down with their therapists and talk about denial.
The left plays for keeps. They have already started the vote fraud
machine in Minnesota, publicly recruiting out-of-state students to come
to register on the same day to vote for Comrade Wellstone.
They have already been caught in massive vote fraud on South Dakota
Indian reservations.
But barring the efforts of their favorite son's ballot stuffers, come
Nov. 6 the Times headline will either contain blistering demands
for a Florida-like recount, complete with old ladies falling over the
hoods of expensive cars, or a more contrite "What went wrong?" in
describing Simon's shocking victory.
The Timelessness of Manufactured Consent
Now that all the apparatchiks have been given their marching orders to
go vote for Joe, it appears more and more that the Central Committee in
Sacramento ideologically resembles 1917 Petrograd.
Historians know that when the 1917 Revolution was successfully
completed, the Bolsheviks controlled Petrograd.
It was Marx who articulated that with the establishment of socialism and
the abolition of social classes, the state would cease to exist. One
party, one voice, no dissent.
And as the acting Molotov of the new Davis proletariat, Garry South,
might say: "Be well, Comrades, and remember: I know exactly where you
live."
See next article in series: Vote for Simon, Save Your Job
You may e-mail Patrick Mallon at patrick@newsmax.com.
A product that might interest you:
David Horowitz shows "How to Beat the Democrats"
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
California Governors Race