Is Fox CNN Lite?
John LeBoutillier
Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2001
The announcement that Fox News Channel has "stolen" Greta
Van Sustern away from CNN is not surprising.
Fox and CNN are fixated on beating each other's brains out. Not an
hour goes by on either network that some anchor doesn't take a dig at his rival.
It all goes back to Ted Turner's disgusting comments about Rupert
Murdoch several years ago. Ever since then, FNC Chairman Roger Ailes has
had one mandate - and only one mandate - beat CNN.
FNC has made steady progress by contrasting itself with CNN's
obvious leftist bias. The now-famous "We report, you decide" motto was
brilliant in its simple design. Hundreds of thousands of news watchers had no
alternative until FNC came along.
One look at Fox was like a breath of fresh air. No liberal slant, no
spinning and no eyebrow-raised cynicism about Republicans.
Ailes is one of the most brilliant people
ever to work in TV - and politics, too. Combative, funny, quick and tough,
Ailes knows that his assignment is to beat CNN. Period!
And that is exactly the problem.
So obsessed with CNN is the entire Fox News Channel team that it is losing sight of what made it gain in the first place: being
different than CNN.
First by hiring Geraldo Rivera, the most liberal, phony,
self-important buffoon on TV, and now the CNN-created Greta Van Sustern, Fox
is turning into CNN Lite!
Where is the differentiation?
Greta is a defense lawyer. Generally no group has been more liberal
or supportive of the left wing of the Democratic Party than defense lawyers.
She could not have lasted 10 years on CNN unless she was way out there.
Putting her on Fox at 10 every night blurs the distinction between the two
rival cable news networks.
Why is Ailes doing this?
1) Spite. He is angry that CNN "stole" Paula Zaun away last August. Luring
Greta away is payback.
2) He hasn't been able to find a suitable 10 p.m. host since Zaun left. Rita
Cosby and Linda Vester vied for the post but have now lost to Greta.
3) A two-fer. Taking Greta away hurts CNN because now it has to
find a suitable replacement - and in the short term perhaps that brings some
previous CNN/Greta viewers over to Fox. That assumes that Greta had much of a
following - which is doubtful.
4) When the Yankees lured Jason Giambi away from the Oakland A's last month
it was George Steinbrenner's way of hurting Oakland twice. Taking
Giambi out of the A's line-up hurts them - and adding him to the Yankees'
lineup helps them. The only problem with this analogy is that Greta Van
Sustern is no star. The betting here is that she will not bring much
additional viewership to Fox.
CNN, if it were smart, would can its liberal lineup such as Jeff Greenfield
and move to the right to pre-empt the Fox line-up.
It hasn't done this yet, as its corporate culture is so hopelessly left
wing that it is incapable of even recognizing the trouble it is in.
It flirted with Rush Limbaugh, which showed it knew it needed to make a
try for conservative viewers. But since then it has largely ignored the
Right - to its peril.
The shame of it all is that news should have no slant whatsoever.
Viewers don't need it or want it.
Let us hope Fox returns to its unbiased outlook - and moves away from its obsession with CNN - before that obsession consumes it.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Media Bias
A product that might interest you:
Get Bill O`Reilly`s New Book Cheaper Than Amazon - Or Anywhere!