U.S. May Help Chinese Biowarfare Labs
Charles R. Smith
Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2001
Before the Second World War, Imperial Japan established Unit 731
under the command of Lt. Gen. Shiro Ishii. Ishii and
his Unit 731 entered China with one purpose: develop and deploy
biological weapons of mass destruction.
Unit 731 operations included poisoning wells in test villages,
dropping plague-infested fleas from planes and spraying whole
areas with anthrax. By the end of the war, Unit 731 produced a
stockpile of more than 200 kilograms of anthrax and developed aerial
bombs to disperse the deadly disease over wide areas.
In addition, Ishii's Unit 731 established a test center inside
an Allied POW camp in Mukden China. Unit 731 killed
hundreds of American prisoners, using them as live targets for
biological test weapons.
During his tenure in China, Ishii killed an estimated 200,000
Chinese civilians using plague, anthrax and germ weapons.
Gen. Tojo and Emperor Hirohito personally approved Ishii's
operations. Ishii, his men and the emperor were never charged
with war crimes.
After Sept. 11, 2001, the world turned upside down. China
is the only nation bordering Afghanistan that does not support
the allied efforts. Even Iran, a longtime foe of the United
States, has quietly assisted American authorities with
intelligence data.
Yet, China is not listed nor mentioned in any dispatch by
official U.S. government sources as supporting the
global effort to stop the reign of terror. The new diplomacy
between Washington and Beijing is seen as a bribe to convince
the communist regime to at least not oppose the campaign along
its western border.
News sources report that U.S. State Department officials are
seeking to relax sanctions against China in an effort to enlist
Beijing's aid in the war on terrorism. The sanctions, imposed
on Beijing after nuclear-tipped M-11 missiles were exported to
Pakistan, halted the exports of supercomputers sold to
suspected military facilities inside China.
Documentation, obtained using the Freedom of Information Act,
shows that in 1997 U.S. Commerce officials approved
supercomputer exports to Chinese weapons labs without an end
use inspection.
In December 1997, U.S. Commerce officials sought permission to
inspect Xian Jiatong University prior to the export of a high-performance computer made by Digital Corp. (DEC). American
inspectors wanted to verify the Chinese university was not using
the computer for weapons research. Instead, all efforts to
inspect the site were denied by the PRC government.
In a letter written to Liu Hu, director general for science and
technology of MOFTEC (Ministry of Foreign Trade & Economic
Cooperation), U.S. Commerce Department officials noted that they
were not given permission to perform the license check.
"We were disappointed at MOFTEC's decision not to allow an
on-site end use check and refusal to permit an Embassy
representative to travel to Xian Jiatong University at the
university's invitation... Because we were unable to work
through MOFTEC, we gathered information on the end-user through
other sources and have approved the license."
The December 1997 letter to MOFTEC's Liu Hu reminded the Chinese
government that it had signed a treaty allowing U.S.
representatives to do a "post" export inspection. However, U.S.
Commerce officials were reduced to seeking "help" from the
Chinese communist government in performing the inspections and
sought another meeting to discuss the issue.
In January 1998 the Commerce Department again contacted the
Chinese government, seeking approval for verification
inspections. The Commerce Department arranged for Bureau of
Export Administration Chief Counsel Hoyt Zia to meet with
China's MOFTEC to discuss the denied checks on U.S.-made
supercomputers.
U.S. Customs Service officials also requested that they attend
the January meeting. U.S. Customs Service officer David Brenner
asked Commerce Official Mark Bayuk if he could attend the
meeting.
Bayuk wrote in a e-mail to Commerce official Matthew Borman, "I
told him rather flatly and abruptly, no." Bayuk described
Customs Service officer Brenner as "not happy" because Bayuk
felt that Customs had no reason to attend the January meeting.
Commerce counsel Hoyt Zia's meeting in January 1998 with China's
MOFTEC official, Zhou Ruojun, failed to obtain Chinese
permission for the inspections. Commerce documentation of the
meeting noted that the Chinese denied all end use supercomputer
inspection checks. Chinese MOFTEC officials argued that there
"was no formal agreement between the two governments on
conducting these checks."
The Chinese delegation also claimed that a 1983 U.S. trade
letter agreeing to the checks "was unsigned" in the Commerce
December 1997 complaint letter. MOFTEC's Zhou considered the
matter "inappropriate" because the letter was unsigned. U.S.
officials dropped the inspection issue "rather than engage in a
fruitless discussion of the U.S.-side's 'understanding' of the
'intent' of the signed exchange of letters."
The Chinese diplomatic stall also continued for pre-export
verification inspections as well. MOFTEC representative Zhou
stated that she was "not in a position to talk too much about
this." The Commerce document notes "she was unwilling to
discuss this [pre-license inspection] issue any further."
Pentagon sources state that Xian Jiatong University is a center
for the Chinese army's biological and chemical warfare research. Xian
is one of the China's super-key universities directly under the
State Education Commission. There are more than 1,000 such
universities in China, but Xian Jiatong is one of only 10 sites
included in Chinese army-sponsored construction projects.
Xian Jiatong University is located in the remote northwest
corner of China near the city of Xian, the site of the
underground Terra-Cotta Army of the First Qin Emperor. Xian is
also a known location of Chinese Army weapons manufacturing
sites such as the Xian Aircraft design bureau, which makes
China's H-6 nuclear strike bombers.
The Xian Jiatong sale is the only known U.S. super-computer
export associated with Chinese biological and chemical warfare.
However, Beijing is known to have more than 1,000 U.S.-made supercomputers at work inside PLA weapon labs.
Pentagon sources are convinced that the Chinese army is using
the supercomputer to develop a chemical cluster "bomblet"
munition to arm missiles and bombers. Instead of a single
warhead, a bomblet warhead would disperse hundreds of miniature
biotoxin-filled grenades each filled with a deadly payload over
a vast area.
The short-term efforts by the present U.S. administration to
bribe Beijing into being a good global citizen are misguided and
dangerous. The temptation to enlist China's good will with
advanced technology exports overwhelmed the last administration.
The result transformed the Chinese army's nuclear weapons labs
into state-of-the-art facilities. We cannot afford to make the
same mistake again.
Before World War II, China suffered directly under the
bio-bomb. Chinese authorities erected a museum in Harbin where
Unit 731 engaged in its deadly experiments on living subjects.
The present-day efforts by Beijing to improve on the horrific
science of death started so long ago by Imperial Japanese
Gen. Ishii is living testimony to the foolishness of mankind.
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Bioterrorism
Bush Administration
China/Taiwan
Clinton Scandals
War on Terrorism
A product that might interest you:
Find out the complete details of China`s and Russia`s Military Buildup in Bitter Legacy: NewsMax Reveals the Untold Story of the Clinton-Gore Years